![]() |
Science Fair Project
i'm working on a science fair project. i'm building an am-radio
transmitter. i can only be a few inches from the receiver. how do i solve this problem without making my antenna enormous. |
Science Fair Project
On 6 Feb 2007 20:55:20 -0800, "T" wrote:
i'm working on a science fair project. i'm building an am-radio transmitter. i can only be a few inches from the receiver. how do i solve this problem without making my antenna enormous. Build a loop stick antenna (Google the term). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Science Fair Project
Or use fine wire to build a larger multi-turn loop antenna into the
perimeter of the "story-board" for your science fair display. If this is truly a science fair project, then the antenna is an important part of the story that should be shown, isn't it? Joe W3JDR "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On 6 Feb 2007 20:55:20 -0800, "T" wrote: i'm working on a science fair project. i'm building an am-radio transmitter. i can only be a few inches from the receiver. how do i solve this problem without making my antenna enormous. Build a loop stick antenna (Google the term). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Science Fair Project
will this boost my transmitter's signal, or the reciever's antenna?
|
Science Fair Project
On 7 Feb 2007 18:45:29 -0800, T posted in total:
will this boost my transmitter's signal, or the reciever's antenna? Will _what_ boost _what_ transmitter's 'signal'???? What is a "reciever"? Oh, I see: Message-ID: . com |
Science Fair Project
On Feb 7, 6:45 pm, "T" wrote:
will this boost my transmitter's signal, or the reciever's antenna? Um, if you connect the better antenna to the transmitter, how would that affect the receiver? If you connect the better antenna to the receiver, how would that affect the transmitter? Clear? Cheers, Tom |
Science Fair Project
On 6 Feb, 20:55, "T" wrote:
i'm working on a science fair project. i'm building an am-radio transmitter. i can only be a few inches from the receiver. how do i solve this problem without making my antenna enormous. If you build an amplifier at the initial recerving antenna which is preferably outside the house the signal within the coax leading to and within the house will be strong enought to overcome the losses entailed by using a long connecting coax. Placing the amplifier at the antenna prevents noise from overpowering the incomming signal The amplifier need only to be a simple transister driven by a battery. Remember that the signal to noise ratio will never be better than the signal recieved by your antenna before amplification which should provide the impetus to build the best antenna you can build and situated in the most desirable place for receiving.. Good luck Art |
Science Fair Project
On Feb 8, 8:07 pm, "art" wrote:
On 6 Feb, 20:55, "T" wrote: i'm working on a science fair project. i'm building an am-radio transmitter. i can only be a few inches from the receiver. how do i solve this problem without making my antenna enormous. Placing the amplifier at the antenna prevents noise from overpowering the incomming signal The amplifier need only to be a simpleIf you build an amplifier at the initial recerving antenna which is preferably outside the house the signal within the coax leading to and within the house will be strong enought to overcome the losses entailed by using a long connecting coax. I think he means the AM broadcast band.. Or I assume anyway. The loss with most any length of coax at that MW freq should be dinky indeed. I built one of those when I was about in 7th grade. Mine had like a small tight wound loop for an antenna if I remember right. But I might have even tried hooking it to to my then SWL antenna which was a 50 ft random wire. I don't know how critical the transister? is as far as match. If it's not picky, you could probably just string out a short wire. There are probably FCC antenna standards as far as such a device, but I'm too lazy to look them up.. I don't think the FCC wants them radiating too far. As far as receiving at MW, Any commercial radio should be good enough with whatever antenna came with it. Well, unless it's a really lousy radio.. :( If you can hear noise in between stations in the daytime, it's good enough and can't really be improved too much as far as s/n ratio. MK |
Science Fair Project
On Feb 7, 9:18 pm, Nobody wrote:
On 7 Feb 2007 18:45:29 -0800, T posted in total: will this boost my transmitter's signal, or the reciever's antenna? Will _what_ boost _what_ transmitter's 'signal'???? What is a "reciever"? ok. let me be more clear. my transmitter is a simple am-radio transmitter. it is essentially an aduio transformer connected to a 1mhz crystal oscillator. i have, connected to my oscillator's antenna lead, a simple telescoping radio antenna, and so my "transmitter"---- [the am-radio transmitter] has to be just a few inches from my "reciever" ----[the am-radio] for the "reciever" to pick up my signal. My question is: will this antenna, the loop stick antenna mentioned above, boost the signal coming from my "transmitter" or will it just allow my reciever to pick up the signal easier? or in other words how will this antenna help me? sorry if i wasn't clear enough before. i just thought you would understand what i was talking about. |
Science Fair Project
On 8 Feb 2007 20:12:15 -0800, "T" wrote:
My question is: will this antenna, the loop stick antenna mentioned above, boost the signal coming from my "transmitter" or will it just allow my reciever to pick up the signal easier? or in other words how will this antenna help me? No one can tell how anything can help if you don't tell us what help you need. Being able to receive inches away speaks to an accomplishment, not a problem. If you want to receive miles away, then the comparison between what is accomplished and what is desired reveals the problem. sorry if i wasn't clear enough before. i just thought you would understand what i was talking about. You never really "talked about" anything when the sum total of your correspondence barely exceeds a half dozen lines up to this posting. Now, we can all presume an intent, and that intent goes counter to what is allowed by law, and that is long distance communication on commercial frequencies by an unlicensed station. The law is exceptionally clear as to how much power is allowed, into how large a radiator, for unlicensed stations (such as yours). The long and short of it is that without exceptionally good reception gear, that distance is rarely more than across the room, or within a block. Clearly, even these distances vastly exceed your current accomplishment of a few inches because you could invest little more effort into doing it with a modulated LED across the room. TV remotes do this a billion times an hour world-wide. Even with the allowed sized radiator, it is pathetically inefficient (which is the intent of the law). The name of the game is called matching, and a XTAL oscillator is a poor power source. However, all of this is strictly window dressing unless the whole scope of your Science Fair project is limited to building a working transmitter. If so, you need to formulate better questions. If not, you are spending too much time when you could build a Ramsey Kit in an afternoon and get on with the grist of the project. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com