Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() given that the length of a half wave dipole is calculated by 468 / freq in mhz when velocity factor is 1, ie 468 / 1.9 is about 246 ft. i'm sitting here wondering why folks with small city lots don't use (468 / freq in mhz) * velocity factor, to construct a much shorter antnenna, particularly on 80m & 160m? as an example, rg59 coax typically has a velocity factor of .66, so plugging to the formula, 468 / 1.9 is about 246 ft, * .66 is about 162 ft. why couldn't 162 ft of rg59 be cut in two, attached to a 50 ohm, have the remaining ends of the rg59 shorted together, and hoisted into the air? so what am i missing? there are no free lunches:-) larry kd5foy |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stripped off coax velocity factor | Antenna | |||
Velocity Factor GT unity | Antenna | |||
Velocity factor of an insulated antenna wire. | Antenna | |||
Insulated Wire Velocity Factor: How to . . ?? | Antenna | |||
Shielded Loop - Velocity Factor? | Antenna |