| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
given that the length of a half wave dipole is calculated by 468 / freq in mhz when velocity factor is 1, ie 468 / 1.9 is about 246 ft. i'm sitting here wondering why folks with small city lots don't use (468 / freq in mhz) * velocity factor, to construct a much shorter antnenna, particularly on 80m & 160m? as an example, rg59 coax typically has a velocity factor of .66, so plugging to the formula, 468 / 1.9 is about 246 ft, * .66 is about 162 ft. why couldn't 162 ft of rg59 be cut in two, attached to a 50 ohm, have the remaining ends of the rg59 shorted together, and hoisted into the air? so what am i missing? there are no free lunches:-) larry kd5foy |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Stripped off coax velocity factor | Antenna | |||
| Velocity Factor GT unity | Antenna | |||
| Velocity factor of an insulated antenna wire. | Antenna | |||
| Insulated Wire Velocity Factor: How to . . ?? | Antenna | |||
| Shielded Loop - Velocity Factor? | Antenna | |||