Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

"Bobby" wrote in message
ups.com...
All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.


Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

ups.com...

All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.

Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

"art" wrote in message
ups.com...
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

ups.com...

All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.

Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio
is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art


Hi Art

I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my post,
I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I would
submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you know
that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly polarized
signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna.
Tell me more about the "weather antennas". What frequency do they use?
Where do they transmit from?

Jerry

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

On 14 Feb, 07:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

ups.com...





On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

roups.com...

All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.

Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio
is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art

Hi Art

I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my post,
I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I would
submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you know
that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly polarized
signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna.
Tell me more about the "weather antennas". What frequency do they use?
Where do they transmit from?

Jerry- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weather experts have found that using both horizontal and vertical
polarizations coming from the same antenna tho in separate pulses that
with oncomming clouds and weather systems that the received picture is
more defined where size of droplets can be determined as well as other
things.
I would suggest that things like wind shear would also be more
discernable.
My antennas because elements are non defined in placement to each
other are capable of multi polarizations which is why I posed the
question.
Art

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

"art" wrote in message
ups.com...
On 14 Feb, 07:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

ups.com...





On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

roups.com...

All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation
from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.

Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial
ratio
is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art

Hi Art

I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my
post,
I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I
would
submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you
know
that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly polarized
signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna.
Tell me more about the "weather antennas". What frequency do they
use?
Where do they transmit from?

Jerry- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weather experts have found that using both horizontal and vertical
polarizations coming from the same antenna tho in separate pulses that
with oncomming clouds and weather systems that the received picture is
more defined where size of droplets can be determined as well as other
things.
I would suggest that things like wind shear would also be more
discernable.
My antennas because elements are non defined in placement to each
other are capable of multi polarizations which is why I posed the
question.
Art

Hi Art

What frequency for the weather signals when using diversity?

Jerry

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

On 14 Feb, 07:52, "art" wrote:
On 14 Feb, 07:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:





"art" wrote in message

oups.com...

On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

roups.com...

All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.

Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio
is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art

Hi Art

I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my post,
I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I would
submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you know
that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly polarized
signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna.
Tell me more about the "weather antennas". What frequency do they use?
Where do they transmit from?

Jerry- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weather experts have found that using both horizontal and vertical
polarizations coming from the same antenna tho in separate pulses that
with oncomming clouds and weather systems that the received picture is
more defined where size of droplets can be determined as well as other
things.
I would suggest that things like wind shear would also be more
discernable.
My antennas because elements are non defined in placement to each
other are capable of multi polarizations which is why I posed the
question.
Art- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you put that same question to Google it would be more informative.
Apparently every forward thinking nations have scientists dabbling
with it
funded by the concern with global warming. I find this all very
interesting because as a ham I had been concentrating on vertical and
horizontal polarizations only Seems like space has opened up the
antenna field such that many will be able to review the path that
antennas have taken over the last century that have appeared to stymy
progress and with an open mind
change course
Art

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation
from
RHCP to LHCP.

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial
ratio
is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.
You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my
post,
I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I
would
submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you
know
that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly polarized
signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna.

Weather experts have found that using both horizontal and vertical
polarizations coming from the same antenna tho in separate pulses that
with oncomming clouds and weather systems that the received picture is
more defined where size of droplets can be determined as well as other
things.

Lots of questions, lots of possible answers.. here goes:
1) While a theoretical antenna of one polarization sense is
insensitive to the opposite sense, in reality, antennas are perfect,
particularly "off boresight". that's what axial ratio tells you.. how
"perfect" is the CP (1 is perfect, 0 is a linear pol, non circular
antenna). Think of it as a continuum from a straight line (linear) to
a circle. Elliptical pol is the general case, and axial ratio is the
ratio between the major and minor axes of the ellipse (to fully
specify the antenna, you'd also need to specify the angle of one of
the axes and the "handed ness")

2) The radiation from an antenna, in a particular direction, can be
represented by a linear combination of two orthogonal polarizations
(orthogonal here has a special meaning... two linear pols separated by
90 degrees is but one case). The two popular systems are CP and linear
(that is you say that the field is (a+bj) horizontal + (c+dj)
vertical. You can do the same for RHCP and LHCP. (and, actually, for
any two linear pols that are different). This is one way to "make" a
cp antenna (combine two linear antennas with the right relative
amplitudes and phases).

3) bear in mind that an antenna may be perfectly CP on boresight
(axial ratio=1) and not CP in other directions. In fact, it can be
proved that no antenna can have the same polarization everywhere (see
the "hairy ball theorem")

Much more info can be found on the web.. wikipedia has an entry on
polarization,antenna books talk about it (Orfanidis' book is online at
Rutgers) Kraus has a nice discussion (particularly appropriate since
axial mode helical antennas are particularly good at being CP)


Now to weather radar...
spherical particles (raindrops) are perfect "depolarizers"... send any
pol to the droplet, and what comes back is equally distributed between
both pols. (spheres are used as cal targets for this reason)
ice crystals, on the other hand, show significant polarization
effects.
Since the polarization effects are also "size of particle" dependent
(relative to wavelength) you can also figure out things like particle
size distribution. that way you can tell the difference between a few
big raindrops and lots of little raindrops.

Most other physical phenomena show some polarization effects, which is
heavily used in radar remote sensing.
You transmit radar pulses of two different polarizations, and receive
the returns with a dual pol receiver, so you essentially get 4
different complex numbers (HH, HV, VV, VH, for linear pol) for the
backscatter.
An example might be looking at forests.. in the summer, when they have
their leaves on, they pretty much randomize the polarization, but in
the winter, the Hpol backscatter is very different from the Vpol
backscatter. Plowed soil has a very different polarization signature
from flat earth. Conifers look different from broadleaf plants.

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...
On 14 Feb, 07:52, "art" wrote:
On 14 Feb, 07:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:





"art" wrote in message

oups.com...

On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

roups.com...

All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP
wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation
from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

Thanks.

Bobby.

Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is
totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial
ratio
is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So,
it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now
migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible
to
totally isolate those too.?
Art

Hi Art

I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my
post,
I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I
would
submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you
know
that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly
polarized
signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna.
Tell me more about the "weather antennas". What frequency do they
use?
Where do they transmit from?

Jerry- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weather experts have found that using both horizontal and vertical
polarizations coming from the same antenna tho in separate pulses that
with oncomming clouds and weather systems that the received picture is
more defined where size of droplets can be determined as well as other
things.
I would suggest that things like wind shear would also be more
discernable.
My antennas because elements are non defined in placement to each
other are capable of multi polarizations which is why I posed the
question.
Art- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you put that same question to Google it would be more informative.
Apparently every forward thinking nations have scientists dabbling
with it
funded by the concern with global warming. I find this all very
interesting because as a ham I had been concentrating on vertical and
horizontal polarizations only Seems like space has opened up the
antenna field such that many will be able to review the path that
antennas have taken over the last century that have appeared to stymy
progress and with an open mind
change course
Art

Hi Art

Sorry Art, my news server seems to have garbeled up your last post. It
was completely scrambled so as to be unreadable. Could you please tell me
what frequency the "weather experts" are using when they use polarization
divirsity? About 90 percent of my antenna learning is directed to
learning about weather data reception from NOAA satellites. Anything I
can learn from the really smart guys like you will be greatly appreciated.
Please tell me more about radio frequency related weather signals, and how
polarization diversity is used.

Jerry

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

ups.com...

All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art


Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.

Dave WD9BDZ

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

On 14 Feb, 09:55, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

roups.com...

All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art

Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.

Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David, could you add to your posting some of it doesn't seem to jive.
Art

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

On 14 Feb, 11:01, "art" wrote:
On 14 Feb, 09:55, "David G. Nagel" wrote:





art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message

roups.com...

All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby

If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.

Jerry

You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art

Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.

Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David, could you add to your posting some of it doesn't seem to jive.
Art- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David , maybe it was I that was not so clear.
My arials are based around a cluster of elements that are at various
placement with respect to each other tho all are resonant as is the
cluster as a whole. So when it is used for diversity operation because
more than one element is resonant choices can be made as to where to
feed to advantage
as quick as possible with a change over such that the reflection is
meaningful with respect to time. I don't believe that the weather
people radiate both at the same time as the search is for purity with
respect to polarity. In fact all the arials ive seen cannot possibly
be pure since they all seem to have elements in the vertical position
which cannot lead to purity in any form. I saw one in a antenna book
( shelnikov)where the elements were in helical form one behind the
other at a 90 degree offset but I have no further knoweledge of that
one. Somebody mentioned that some radios are now made with two ports
such that the receive portion automatically switches to the loudest
signal to overcome fading so I may well be incorrect about
simultaneous transmissions or even if two arials are in use.
Art

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

art wrote:
On 14 Feb, 09:55, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message
ups.com...
All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby
If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.
Jerry
You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art
Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.

Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David, could you add to your posting some of it doesn't seem to jive.
Art



Art;

OnPage 23.35 of the ARRL 2006 Handbook is a Graph showing the relative
loss between two antenna's for various angles from 0 degree to 90 degree
misalignment. For 0 degree misalignment there is no loss, at 50 degrees
there is a 3.84 dB loss and at 80 degrees there is a loss of 15.2 dB. 90
degree misalignment shows an infinate loss. This is for linear
antenna's. Circular Polarized antennas of opposite turns show an
infinate loss between two antenna's.
If I can help further please feel free to contact me direct:


Dave WD9BDZ

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

art wrote:
On 14 Feb, 11:01, "art" wrote:
On 14 Feb, 09:55, "David G. Nagel" wrote:





art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message
ups.com...
All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby
If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.
Jerry
You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art
Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.
Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
David, could you add to your posting some of it doesn't seem to jive.
Art- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David , maybe it was I that was not so clear.
My arials are based around a cluster of elements that are at various
placement with respect to each other tho all are resonant as is the
cluster as a whole. So when it is used for diversity operation because
more than one element is resonant choices can be made as to where to
feed to advantage
as quick as possible with a change over such that the reflection is
meaningful with respect to time. I don't believe that the weather
people radiate both at the same time as the search is for purity with
respect to polarity. In fact all the arials ive seen cannot possibly
be pure since they all seem to have elements in the vertical position
which cannot lead to purity in any form. I saw one in a antenna book
( shelnikov)where the elements were in helical form one behind the
other at a 90 degree offset but I have no further knoweledge of that
one. Somebody mentioned that some radios are now made with two ports
such that the receive portion automatically switches to the loudest
signal to overcome fading so I may well be incorrect about
simultaneous transmissions or even if two arials are in use.
Art

Art;

I responded to your other email but what you are saying here is that you
are using multiple antenna's which are selected automatically to sense
the strongest signal reguardless of the orientation of the received
signal. i.e. if the signal is at 45 degrees the antenna that is fixed to
a 45 degree angle will be the strongest signal. If I have it correct it
makes perfect sense but is not cross or circular polarization just
rotated wave front.

Dave WD9BDZ

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

"David G. Nagel" wrote in message
...

OnPage 23.35 of the ARRL 2006 Handbook is a Graph showing the relative
loss between two antenna's for various angles from 0 degree to 90 degree
misalignment. For 0 degree misalignment there is no loss, at 50 degrees
there is a 3.84 dB loss and at 80 degrees there is a loss of 15.2 dB. 90
degree misalignment shows an infinate loss. This is for linear
antenna's.

Yes. I wasted *hours* at Field Day a few years ago trying to make FM
contacts on 440 with my beam oriented parallel to the horizon. (I play with
TV DX and I brain-cramped with my 440 beam.)

When somebody pointed out my error, I wanted to crawl in a hole. This
monumental screwup came despite the fact that I had been making 2m contacts
with a correctly-oriented beam. Go figure. But it proved the heck out of
the theory!!!!

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

On 14 Feb, 18:46, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 14 Feb, 09:55, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message
egroups.com...
All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby
If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.
Jerry
You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art
Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.

Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David, could you add to your posting some of it doesn't seem to jive.
Art

Art;

OnPage 23.35 of the ARRL 2006 Handbook is a Graph showing the relative
loss between two antenna's for various angles from 0 degree to 90 degree
misalignment. For 0 degree misalignment there is no loss, at 50 degrees
there is a 3.84 dB loss and at 80 degrees there is a loss of 15.2 dB. 90
degree misalignment shows an infinate loss. This is for linear
antenna's. Circular Polarized antennas of opposite turns show an
infinate loss between two antenna's.
If I can help further please feel free to contact me direct:


Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David I am not privy to a copy of what you are talking about but we
may be talking at cross purposes. My point is that a element at right
angles or parallel to the earths surface cannot present a pure
polarised field.
When looking at a radiating beam you have two vectors, one at right
angles to the other, therefore I fail to see how radiation would
appear at right angles to the earths surface. True the right angled
vector is reduced when it is broken up into two vectors when it is
seen as curl but the horizontal vector cannot be removed or cancelled
unless the element is tilted somewhat.
Anybody can prove this to themselves by the use of the plethora of
computor programs Admittedly the tilt required is small but it is
there none the less.
Art

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

Sal M. Onella wrote:
"David G. Nagel" wrote in message
...

OnPage 23.35 of the ARRL 2006 Handbook is a Graph showing the relative
loss between two antenna's for various angles from 0 degree to 90 degree
misalignment. For 0 degree misalignment there is no loss, at 50 degrees
there is a 3.84 dB loss and at 80 degrees there is a loss of 15.2 dB. 90
degree misalignment shows an infinate loss. This is for linear
antenna's.

Yes. I wasted *hours* at Field Day a few years ago trying to make FM
contacts on 440 with my beam oriented parallel to the horizon. (I play with
TV DX and I brain-cramped with my 440 beam.)

When somebody pointed out my error, I wanted to crawl in a hole. This
monumental screwup came despite the fact that I had been making 2m contacts
with a correctly-oriented beam. Go figure. But it proved the heck out of
the theory!!!!




It's called a brain fart...

It's also why antenna science is an ART.


Dave WD9BDZ

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

art wrote:
On 14 Feb, 18:46, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 14 Feb, 09:55, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message
ups.com...
All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby
If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.
Jerry
You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art
Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.
Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
David, could you add to your posting some of it doesn't seem to jive.
Art
Art;

OnPage 23.35 of the ARRL 2006 Handbook is a Graph showing the relative
loss between two antenna's for various angles from 0 degree to 90 degree
misalignment. For 0 degree misalignment there is no loss, at 50 degrees
there is a 3.84 dB loss and at 80 degrees there is a loss of 15.2 dB. 90
degree misalignment shows an infinate loss. This is for linear
antenna's. Circular Polarized antennas of opposite turns show an
infinate loss between two antenna's.
If I can help further please feel free to contact me direct:


Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David I am not privy to a copy of what you are talking about but we
may be talking at cross purposes. My point is that a element at right
angles or parallel to the earths surface cannot present a pure
polarised field.
When looking at a radiating beam you have two vectors, one at right
angles to the other, therefore I fail to see how radiation would
appear at right angles to the earths surface. True the right angled
vector is reduced when it is broken up into two vectors when it is
seen as curl but the horizontal vector cannot be removed or cancelled
unless the element is tilted somewhat.
Anybody can prove this to themselves by the use of the plethora of
computor programs Admittedly the tilt required is small but it is
there none the less.
Art


Art;

Your right horizontal is horizontal and vertical is vertical and never
the twain shall meet.

Dave

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

On 15 Feb, 07:48, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 14 Feb, 18:46, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 14 Feb, 09:55, "David G. Nagel" wrote:
art wrote:
On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
"Bobby" wrote in message
glegroups.com...
All,
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.
Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.
Thanks.
Bobby.
Hi Bobby
If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally
insensitive to LHCP.
If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is
the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it
varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to
Circular.
Jerry
You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities
insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating
to
dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to
totally isolate those too.?
Art
Any cross polarization situation will exhibit insensitivity to others.
For instance take a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna at a
distance. There is a signifant reduction in signal strength.
Or take a dipole oriented NS and a dipole oriented EW and you will see a
loss of signal also.
Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
David, could you add to your posting some of it doesn't seem to jive.
Art
Art;

OnPage 23.35 of the ARRL 2006 Handbook is a Graph showing the relative
loss between two antenna's for various angles from 0 degree to 90 degree
misalignment. For 0 degree misalignment there is no loss, at 50 degrees
there is a 3.84 dB loss and at 80 degrees there is a loss of 15.2 dB. 90
degree misalignment shows an infinate loss. This is for linear
antenna's. Circular Polarized antennas of opposite turns show an
infinate loss between two antenna's.
If I can help further please feel free to contact me direct:


Dave WD9BDZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David I am not privy to a copy of what you are talking about but we
may be talking at cross purposes. My point is that a element at right
angles or parallel to the earths surface cannot present a pure
polarised field.
When looking at a radiating beam you have two vectors, one at right
angles to the other, therefore I fail to see how radiation would
appear at right angles to the earths surface. True the right angled
vector is reduced when it is broken up into two vectors when it is
seen as curl but the horizontal vector cannot be removed or cancelled
unless the element is tilted somewhat.
Anybody can prove this to themselves by the use of the plethora of
computor programs Admittedly the tilt required is small but it is
there none the less.
Art

Art;

Your right horizontal is horizontal and vertical is vertical and never
the twain shall meet.

Dave- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But David they must meet otherwise radiation cannot occur !

Antenna Axial Ratio RHCP LHCP
 

Bobby wrote:
All,

How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from
RHCP to LHCP.

Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful.

That's an easy one.

The axial ratio of a purely RHCP wave is 1. The axial ratio of a purely
LHCP wave is 1. The transformation would be 1 = 1.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL