Among EZNEC users are aerospace companies, U.S. and foreign government
agencies, universities, domestic and international broadcasters, cell
phone providers, space agencies, telecommunications companies, and a
very wide range of others. They are designing antennas which you make
use of daily.

The purchaser truly is in the position of caveat emptor, and the legal
notice included with EZNEC carefully spells this out in legalese. But
EZNEC also has an unconditional full money back satisfaction guarantee,
and none of the above users have asked for a refund.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

art wrote:

The bottom line should be is EZNEC accurate? Has the programming been
held within the confines provided by the original provider'
the U.S. government. Who overseas the content of this so called
program. If it has a patent then all would or should be revealed
in the patent disclosure. Has anybody taken this for his own use for
the advancement of science which is the reason for patents?
Has anybody upgraded the assigned patent for the sake of science
or has something not been disclosed to prevent true examination
and as such invalidates the patent? Does the government have the
option of review of all algorithms or are they in the same position
the country is with voting machines? Basically the purchaser is really
in the position of caveat emptor especially since all programs provide
different results!
Art