art wrote:

Even asked
Arie to check his but only silence reigned which emphasises that
people are just lazy or choose to remain silent when un unsuitable
answer occurrs.

Aha, could be so. I can't remember or maybe I have banned it from my
memory :-)

But I agree I am also lazy and there are a lot of questions for which
I do not have an answer (yet), but (I hope) I have an open mind and I
am never too old to learn.

( This also emphasises what a great job W4RLN is doing
for ham radio where he points out where all the programs differ and
who he perceives as correct.

I agree completely. Maybe the future will learn that we were fooled by
Nec2/4 and/or other software, but as long as I do not have (or am
willing to spend the funds for) a more accurate method of predicting
behavour or performance I am afraid I will have to stick with it.

To me it shows that the human mind really only believes what he wants to believe
so a program with high gain results is the best seller even tho
inaccurate.

Hmm is it so ?. I don't know. If you ask me, every person does have
it's own motives to decide if he buys or uses one program or the
other, and how much he does trust the results obtained with the
method(s) or underlaying software used by the program.

Arie.