| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The devil is in the details... Note that I included the words, "decent top hat"... For 40 it should pull the vertical close to resonance... For 80 I would not argue with your prescription for an outboard loading coil to help the tuner efficiency... BTW Ed, a coil Q of 1000 is going to be very tough to hit... If you do get it please share the details... Well, I may have stretched the Q factor a bit.... but in looking at the following site, I would suppose its possible.... http://www.texasbugcatcher.com/cata/tbcspec.htm#6inch scroll down until you view the #680 coil and read his text below. That is what I had in mind if building a center loaded vertical. I would not use a top hat in my case. Per other comments in this thread, I see that perhaps I may get best performance by using a combination of center loaded for 4MHz and using a tuner for 40... and maybe 60. I'm really not interested in any other bands. As for radials, remember, even though intended for fixed station use only, this is still a mobile antenna, and my RV parking situation in many crowded spaces will preclude the layout of radials of any significance. Thanks for all the "food for thought" on this. Ed K7AAT |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed, K7AAT wrote:
"I`m really not interested in other bands." Phil Rand, W1DBM, wrote a QST article on "Antenns for Travel Trailers and Campers" which was reprinted in the 1978 "Antenna Anthology". Phil shared his experience and measurements on 3963 kHz using various antennas on the Airstream Travel Trailer Net. Phil found that the best temporary antenna was a high dipole. Next best was a loop antenna in which the Airstream trailer was included in the lower art of the loop. Table 3 in the article gives 7 trailer antenna choices and their signal strengths as compared with a home station dipole at 50 ft. high. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Phil Rand, W1DBM, wrote a QST article on "Antenns for Travel Trailers and Campers" which was reprinted in the 1978 "Antenna Anthology". Phil shared his experience and measurements on 3963 kHz using various antennas on the Airstream Travel Trailer Net. Phil found that the best temporary antenna was a high dipole. Next best was a loop antenna in which the Airstream trailer was included in the lower art of the loop. Table 3 in the article gives 7 trailer antenna choices and their signal strengths as compared with a home station dipole at 50 ft. high. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI I do have a homemade short Inverted V for 75M, ( 24' per leg ) which I pack around.... but as I have stated, most of my parking situations preclude putting out anything beyond a very short perimeter around my rig.... necessitating a vertical, ( with very short radials at best). I will try to find that publication, but unless it includes verticals for 75M / 40M, it probably won't help much in my case. Thanks anyway! Ed K7AAT ( 30' Class C motorhome, BTW ) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed, K7AAT wrote:
"....but as I stated, most of my parking situations preclude putting out anything beyond a short perimeter around my rig.... necessitating a vertical, (with very short radials at best)." Phil faced the same challenge. Item (1) of his summary says: "Carry a complete set of mobile whips for lunch stops, or other occasions where you do not have the time or room for anything better." First on the list in Table 3 is: "Hustler 75-meter mobile whip mounted vertically on the rear corner of trailer...... S7" Item (2) says: "If at all possible, use a 1/4-wave counterpoise clipped tothe trailer when using a mobile whip." Second on the list in Table 3 is; "Same as above, with 60-foot counterpoise wire connected to trailer...................................S9" So the counter poise adds about 12 dB to the signal. A 15-ft high (at the center) 120-ft long dipole is S9+20 dB in Table 3, but surprisingly the loop including the trailer is its equal. The loop is only 30 feet long, or almost the length of the trailer. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZi |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Phil faced the same challenge. Item (1) of his summary says: "Carry a complete set of mobile whips for lunch stops, or other occasions where you do not have the time or room for anything better." First on the list in Table 3 is: "Hustler 75-meter mobile whip mounted vertically on the rear corner of trailer...... S7" That's all I have right now. 75M resonator, and the antenna is mounted on top my rear ladder.... which is well bonded to the chassis frame down below. It works rather well, I believe, but both I and my wife don't want me climbing the ladder for installation/removal, or tuning purposes. Item (2) says: "If at all possible, use a 1/4-wave counterpoise clipped tothe trailer when using a mobile whip." Will try that... Second on the list in Table 3 is; "Same as above, with 60-foot counterpoise wire connected to trailer...................................S9" I suppose a 60' coil of small wire wouldn't be hard to pack.... will try that too, when space allows. BUT, since I'm mostly on 75/80, whats the difference between the first two, anyway? So the counter poise adds about 12 dB to the signal. A 15-ft high (at the center) 120-ft long dipole is S9+20 dB in Table 3, but surprisingly the loop including the trailer is its equal. The loop is only 30 feet long, or almost the length of the trailer. Well, certainly don't have space for that dipole, and the RV is fibreglass so no easy way to include it in a loop. Also, though I didn't previously mention, don't want the antenna to be that noticable. A vertical has less visual impact, in my opinion, in that area. Thanks, Richard. Ed K7AAT |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Better for DX: Vertical or dipole? | Antenna | |||
| Vertical radiation from horizontal dipole? | Antenna | |||
| 1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
| Dipoles & Tuned Circuits | Antenna | |||