Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The devil is in the details... Note that I included the words, "decent top hat"... For 40 it should pull the vertical close to resonance... For 80 I would not argue with your prescription for an outboard loading coil to help the tuner efficiency... BTW Ed, a coil Q of 1000 is going to be very tough to hit... If you do get it please share the details... Well, I may have stretched the Q factor a bit.... but in looking at the following site, I would suppose its possible.... http://www.texasbugcatcher.com/cata/tbcspec.htm#6inch scroll down until you view the #680 coil and read his text below. That is what I had in mind if building a center loaded vertical. I would not use a top hat in my case. Per other comments in this thread, I see that perhaps I may get best performance by using a combination of center loaded for 4MHz and using a tuner for 40... and maybe 60. I'm really not interested in any other bands. As for radials, remember, even though intended for fixed station use only, this is still a mobile antenna, and my RV parking situation in many crowded spaces will preclude the layout of radials of any significance. Thanks for all the "food for thought" on this. Ed K7AAT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Better for DX: Vertical or dipole? | Antenna | |||
Vertical radiation from horizontal dipole? | Antenna | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
Dipoles & Tuned Circuits | Antenna |