Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like too much work! The loss of 50 Ohm feedline at 80 and 40 meters
isn't worth worrying about. "K7JEB" wrote in message news:udpSb.13355$tP1.11645@fed1read07... DOUGLAS SNOWDEN, N4IJ, wrote: I am planning on putting up a ground mounted vertical for 40 and 80 meters. Somewhere between 70-90 ft tall and insulated from the ground. The antenna will be about 275 ft from the shack. My question: is it advisable to feed a vertical with open wire feeder? Consider using an UNBALANCED, open-wire line. It would consist of three wires fairly close together with uniform spacing between them. The center wire is "hot" and the outer two are "ground". At the antenna, the two ground wires connect to the ground radials and the center one connects to the vertical radiator. At the shack end, your matchbox would be configured to feed a "longwire" with the center wire connecting to the "longwire" terminal and the two ground wires connecting to the matchbox case (and shack ground). No matching networks or baluns are needed at the antenna. The line has a fairly high SWR on it, but also has low loss and thus maintains efficiency. All matching is done in the shack under your direct control. The downside is that you would have to make the line yourself out of ordinary house wire and plexiglass spacers and support it off the ground on poles. If you used commercially available ladder line, you would have to support it anyway, so that's pretty much a wash. I am thinking it would work ok either directly or through a balun on one or each end of the feedline, but how does one keep the RF from the radiator from unbalancing the line? Or would it just tend to hit both sides of the line and not upset the balance? The unbalancing issue goes away completely with this kind of line. This scheme was widely used in broadcasting in the 30's and 40's but fell out of favor because it required a bit more maintenance than buried hardline. Jim, K7JEB Glendale, AZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Daffodil Swain wrote:
Sounds like too much work! The loss of 50 Ohm feedline at 80 and 40 meters isn't worth worrying about. For 275 ft. of RG-58 with an SWR of 1:1 on 40m, one would lose ~half of one's power in the feedline. With an SWR of 10:1, one would lose ~75% of one's power in the feedline. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I made the mistake of assuming one would not be stupid enough to run 275
feet of RG58. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dr. Daffodil Swain wrote: Sounds like too much work! The loss of 50 Ohm feedline at 80 and 40 meters isn't worth worrying about. For 275 ft. of RG-58 with an SWR of 1:1 on 40m, one would lose ~half of one's power in the feedline. With an SWR of 10:1, one would lose ~75% of one's power in the feedline. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Daffodil Swain wrote:
I made the mistake of assuming one would not be stupid enough to run 275 feet of RG58. You said: The loss of 50 Ohm feedline at 80 and 40 meters isn't worth worrying about. RG-58 *is* 50 ohm feedline. Aren't you glad I didn't choose RG-174? :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dr. Daffodil Swain wrote: Sounds like too much work! The loss of 50 Ohm feedline at 80 and 40 meters isn't worth worrying about. For 275 ft. of RG-58 with an SWR of 1:1 on 40m, one would lose ~half of one's power in the feedline. With an SWR of 10:1, one would lose ~75% of one's power in the feedline. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp 275 feet of garden variety RG8Foam would have a loss of about 1.5 db at 10 MHz. LMR400 about 1db. Do NOT use RG213. Tam/WB2TT |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarmo Tammaru" wrote in message ... .... 275 feet of garden variety RG8Foam would have a loss of about 1.5 db at 10 MHz. LMR400 about 1db. Do NOT use RG213. What's wrong with RG213? __ Steve KI5YG .. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |