| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Wayne wrote: Thanks for the reply. My dipole example is intended to avoid transmission line issues by not having one, and the elements are assumed to be reasonably low loss. If I do some quick back-of-the-envelope calculations, for a VSWR of 1.3:1, I get an efficiency of about 98.3% (using the equation 1-gamma^2). Assuming a resistance of 1 ohm in the dipole conductors the efficiency I calculate is about 98.6% (72/73). Are there any other loss issues missing in this example. There is no relationship between SWR and efficiency. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Agreed. For example, SWR into a dummy load. The equation given was just to show the approximation I was trying to make for the dipole case. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Yagi efficiency | Antenna | |||
| Yagi efficiency | Antenna | |||
| measuring antenna resonance with an 8405a | Antenna | |||
| High Efficiency Mobile HF Antenna? | Antenna | |||