On 9 mrt, 22:06, Roy Lewallen wrote:

I'm sorry to see that some of my postings and comments about EZNEC are
regarded by anyone as advertising, since I don't believe that
advertising is appropriate here.

Oh no that's not what I had in mind to say. Maybe I wrote it a bit
clumsy
because english is not my mother language. Many excuses for the
misunderstanding. I think you do a great job answering most of the
antenna related questions in this group. Most answers also provide me
with new information and/or insights.

Concerning Art's antenne, I am afraid I got lost somehow. Did Art
deliver
me a model and/or AO results. I am not sure anymore, because I
consult
this newsgroup only once each few days.
Art could send me his *.ant model file and let lme know what (good and/
or
wrong) resutls he got with AO and I'll let him know if I got similar
results or not.

Arie.

On 10 Mar 2007 13:48:43 -0800, "4nec2" wrote:

Concerning Art's antenne, I am afraid I got lost somehow. Did Art
deliver
me a model and/or AO results. I am not sure anymore, because I
consult
this newsgroup only once each few days.

Hi Arie,

As always, Art has a choice of what to discuss, and it is rarely
technical.

Art could send me his *.ant model file

The world waits in wonder.

Hi Art,

You asked for:
1. Modeling help;
2. Foreign (unamerican) aid;
3. A friendly response;
4. More optimization.

WWAD? (what would Art do?)

Hi Arie,

If you don't confirm his design is the best, then the mist you feel on
your face will not be the fresh Spring dew of early morning. Art may
have to appeal to extra-terrestrials for proof.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC