"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 16, 6:07 pm, John Smith I wrote:
THE POST I WAS RESPONDING TO, AND MY POST IN RESPONSE:
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Cecil Moore wrote:

...
Legally, it is not a contract unless you agree to it.
What would happen if you simply crossed out the antenna
restrictions clause before signing the contract?
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com


Wouldn't ya' rather stab the person who drafted it with a pen? evil
grin

Regards,
JS
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
END OF MY RESPONSE POST

REASON WHY RRAM COULD NOT MORALLY/ETHICALLY ALLOW SUCH POST:
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Borderline inappropriate (advocacy of violence, even if joking, and
not much more). - K3FU

where is violence advocated?

well MD claims that in asking what problems see with the fact you can
pass the written test while missing all the rules and reg question is
advocating no change at all

Of course, conversely, had somebody said, "Wouldn't ya' rather stab Mark
with a pen? " you can bet your Bagels Mark would have whined and cried that
somebody was threatening his life.