Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
"ve2pid" wrote in news:1174098010.745176.35010 : Hi to all, I read somewhere that, in the case of Yagis, ''in the range of 25-35 Ohm you get the best balance between gain, pattern, bandwidth and element currents.''' Is that true? And if so, I would like to have the theoretical explanation behind this. I don't understand why there is such a relationship, if there is. I don't think there is such a relationship either. The feedpoint impedance is part of the results from the design process, along with the gain, pattern and beamwidth; but it does not determine any of those other properties. The so-called "best balance" between all these properties will depend entirely on the personal priorities of the designer or the user. (Antenna optimization software demands very clear instructions about this, and forces you to think very hard about what you really mean by "best".) Many good designs do have a feedpoint impedance in that 25-35 ohms region; but so do some real lemons, too, so it isn't a reliable indicator. As Roy says, yagis with much lower feedpoint impedances tend to have high internal (I^2*R) losses, which increase rapidly as the impedance falls and element currents rise. Those can be classified as poor designs, simply because there are plenty of better alternatives. Also, it is possible with many designs to increase the feedpoint impedance towards 50 ohms by adding a director at very close spacing (about 0.05 wl). That director has relatively little effect on other performance parameters, so it can be added fairly late in the design process as a means of matching. (After construction, that close-spaced director also allows final adjustment of the matching, by bending the ends towards or away from the driven element.) Yagis are often designed for a feedpoint impedance that is relatively easily transformed to 50 ohms for the main transmission line. A quarter wave transformer from 28 ohms to 50 ohms is relatively easily made from two parallel 75 ohm lines. Perhaps that is the attraction to the impedance range you mention. That is a very reasonable strategy: if the impedance comes somewhere close to a convenient value for matching, then optimize it to exactly that value. For example, DK7ZB has developed a range of yagi designs optimized for 28 ohms. There are links to these and several other designs from: http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/diy-yagi/index.htm -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to Measure a 2M Yagi Impedance? | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Swap | |||
Yagi Antenna Impedance | Antenna |