Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Mar, 20:41, Owen Duffy wrote:
"Yuri Blanarovich" wrote : ... I realized that Yagi has low impedance and I generally do not like any matching and introducing unnecessary loses. The way for maximum gain, clean pattern, great F/B, 50 ohm feedpoint impedance and no matching gizmos to me was to go Quad and Quad/Yagi element combinations. Quads have higher impedance and by adding elements, the impedance would drop to around 50 ohms. Yuri, that is your approach, but it is not the only one. Others of us quantify the expected transformation losses, and add them into the gain equation to deal with the effects, making a design selection on a rational basis rather that just excluding a whole bunch of solutions because of a prejudice about matching loss. Owen Owen I agree. Amateurs and probably some professionals place to much weight on total antenna gain as opposed to maximum gain of the required polarity and frankly polarity is always of primary importance for all antennas. This rationality also include the attainment of less required compromises with other factors when dealing with bandwidth (per the above comments referncing matching.) Compromises with respect to the design of yagi antennas is extensively described in most ARRL publications and are best avoided. Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to Measure a 2M Yagi Impedance? | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Swap | |||
Yagi Antenna Impedance | Antenna |