Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() In persuit of the BPL issue, I have explored small untuned loops for field strength measurement. Comparison of a loop calibrated to an NEC2 model to a commercial loop with traceable calibration was very encouraging. Constructors would like to use insulated wire for such a loop, and that raises the question of the effect of insulation on the Antenna Factor. My guess is that where the loop is small, current is uniform and the effect of a slightly different phase shift around the loop due to the insulation would be very small. That would be less so at frequencies approaching the first resonance of the loop. My understanding is that NEC4 might provide a good estimate of the difference between insulated and uninsulated wire. I don't have NEC4 and am looking for someone who might be prepared to run a bunch of models for me in batch mode. I would supply the model decks and a batch file to run them, my volunteer would need to run the batch file and zip the output files up and mail them back to me for analysis. My intention is to produce the same data that is plotted at http://www.vk1od.net/SmallUntunedSquareLoop/ssulNEC.htm for each loop, and to plot the dB difference vs frequency to infer some general guidance on loop sizes where conductor insulation becomes significant to Antenna Factor. Comments / volunteers? Owen owen at vk1od.net |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Small loops for reception | Antenna | |||
Need to buy sheets of fiberglass insulation | Antenna | |||
Major error found in my small coax loops | Antenna | |||
Effect of small powerline devices | General | |||
Effect of small powerline devices | General |