Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why?
Antennas seemed to have evolved into structures that
are parallel or at right angles to the earths surface Why is this or is it asthetics that is driving this thinking? My research on the subject evolves around the vector formation of radiation and where the addition of the vectors involved which creats radiation is at an angle to the radiator.. This suggests that for best radiative advantage it is this vector that should be parallel to the earths surface and not the physical radiator. This appears to be born out by following my Gaussian approach to radiator design. So the question of habitual arrangement of antenna arrays parallel or at right angles to the earths surface as being the best arrangement needs some sort of validation. Any thoughts as to why it should be so and the scientific facts that support it? Art |