Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:12:41 -0700, dansawyeror
wrote: The input to Reg's program is: F 4 MHz H 1 M L 3.3 M D 25 mm A 98 B 70 R .7 G 40 This yields 3.2 Ohms input impedance. The coil can be made from PVC and 12 gage wire, the rod, wire, can be 1 inch copper tubing. Reg's c_poise program predicts a reasonable set of parameters, a 10 foot 'wire tube', one meter up, and a coil in the range of 50 uH. The program predicts a 'ground' in the range of 5 Ohms. How oversimplified is this? Hi Dan, By Reggie's own warning, it will suffer for being so close in proximity to earth. He does, however, offer the advice (probably for any construction) to allow enough surplus material to permit tuning. I should point out that with any tool, its utility is comparing its forecast with your results. If you do enough constructions against that tool, and you look at the range of forecasts and compare to results, you will build your own correction factors that will make future constructions easier to accomplish. This lesson was more what Reggie was trying to teach. Those who use his tools without examination would be eaten alive by the Sewer Rats of Rio. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No CounterPoise - Portable Antenna System | Shortwave | |||
Tuned circuit Q question | Homebrew | |||
old trunking system information MISC system info | Scanner |