Constructive interference in radiowave propagation
 

On 17 Apr 2007 16:38:12 -0700, K7ITM wrote:

You're welcome to think it's true TEM if you wish, of course, but your
saying it, over and over if you wish, isn't going to be nearly as
convincing as if we can find one, even one, ligitimate reference that
claims true TEM.

Hi Tom,

What a hoot. "True" TEM? As distinct from virtual TEM? That is
about as funny as "ligitimate reference." Coining terms is a
wonderful thing if you can collect a royalty for their use.

These growing constraints have all the hallmarks of a shopping list of
suitor objections from the eternal spinster.

I reported TEM00 and offered supporting links. Just call me a liar so
I can regain my dignity. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC