Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Apr 2007 17:20:40 -0700, art wrote:
On 28 Apr, 13:14, Richard Clark wrote: On 28 Apr 2007 11:18:14 -0700, art wrote: AO program by Brian Beazely which is Minninec based but Brian has not supported that program in years. Based on that info I suspect that could be classed now as freeware so a Google search may well supply a user that is willing to provide a copy. This would be a clear case of piracy and the violation of copyright held by the owner. Any attempts of others to provide "free" or "paid" copies are violating that law. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Nothing is "clear" with respect to copyright. I am quite sure that Brian Beazely "clearly" marked his product with the necessary marks of intellectual property ownership. If a library owns a copy and then makes another copy for patrons use That never happens in any reputable Library. They have absolutely no interest in supporting piracy. you again get into another murky area because that involves a exception area that is not clear in substance. There is nothing murky about copying Brian Beazely's product and distributing it. You are not going to get a pirated copy from any Library. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |