Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 May, 04:13, (J. B. Wood) wrote:
In article , Roy Lewallen wrote: The problems you're encountering are the result of trying to oversimplify electromagnetic theory by reducing it to conceptual models which are far from adequate. Your basic conceptual models are faulty, so any conclusions you draw from using these models will eventually lead to contradictions. That same problem has, in fact, been the cause of a huge number of argumentative postings on this newsgroup. snip Well stated, Roy. I suspect the majority of hams are not degreed EEs that have delved into elementary electromagnetic theory (It was the least popular EE course when I was an undergrad.) Of course you don't need an in-depth understanding to get on the air. The problem, as you point out, arises when folks start going beyond the "practical" and hobby aspects (e.g. beyond the scope of the ARRL handbooks) by providing explanations of phenomena that are not supported by electromagnetic theory as embodied in Maxell's equations. snip Hmmmmm! Then how do you account for the broad rejection from "EE"s of Gaussian antennas that comply and are supported by electromagnetic theory as embodied in Maxwells equations ? As you put your address as the "Naval Research Laboratory" where would you place the responsability for rejection? Personaly I would place it in the syndrome of " Not invented at my place" which always trumps the pursuit of pure science. You are not alone ofcourse, as even esteemed institutions such as Nasa and Universities follow the same regimen since their concerns are with their own pockets rather than science for itself. I read the other day that antenna design was holding up what appears to be tremendous advances in science especially in the science of communications. Yet derision is placed at the feet of the inventors of many antenna theories for having the temerity of challenging the "all is known" attitudes where curiousity should have always reigned. Art. , John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail: Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20375-5337 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Attenuator formula, asymetrical | Boatanchors | |||
power formula for vswr? | Homebrew | |||
Antenna Length Formula | Scanner | |||
formula for UHF element spacing. | Antenna | |||
Formula 1 | Scanner |