Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 3, 8:59 pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
wrote: Well, it is, as far as designing the antenna. . . MK And MK takes the bait, hook, line, and sinker. The fight is on, and the fish will be played until he can't so much as wiggle a fin. . . Roy Lewallen, W7EL I like to stir it. But there is no fight to be fought. I'm not arguing with him. I just fail to see any real advantage of considering coil current "taper", or whatever you would want to call it when designing a typical bugcatcher. From many of his posts, you would think it's a required consideration, or rewards one with super performance not available to a designer using regular ole lumped coil theory. The coil is still going to end up being mounted in the same place either route you take. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Attenuator formula, asymetrical | Boatanchors | |||
power formula for vswr? | Homebrew | |||
Antenna Length Formula | Scanner | |||
formula for UHF element spacing. | Antenna | |||
Formula 1 | Scanner |