Cecil doesnt seem to worry about this error, but just saying it
doesn't actually mean anything without differences. What is different
about his claim and Wests'?

On May 13, 3:52 pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 18:17:29 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Tedious Xerography snipped as being obviously unread by Xerographer.

Exactly what did I miss?

If you have to be taken by the hand to have it pointed out to you, you
shouldn't be doing these kind of things without adult supervision.

A

I have taken Wes's helical coil from:
http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/Loaded%20antennas.htm
B
and modeled it with EZNEC. ...
That coil512.EZ file can be downloaded from:

is distinctly false.

A B
Does a symbolic reply nail it down?