Jim Kelley wrote:
The advantage to using pulses is that they are 'broadband' - they don't
have "A" frequency. The inductance and capacitance of the system are
unaffected by the small signals one impresses upon it.

But we are not interested in the phase delay for all
those other frequencies. We are only interested in the
phase delay at one particular frequency. And since we are
talking about distributed networks and not lumped circuits,
the inductance and capacitance of the coil does change with
frequency. Whatever measurements we make need to be made
at the frequency of operation.

The antenna behaves physically in exactly the same way whether or not it
happens to be 'occupied' by waves, standing, sitting, or whatever during
measurement. If you want to know how long it take an electromagnetic
wave to traverse a conductor in any shape or configuration, you pulse it
and measure how long it takes, either to get from one end to the other,
or to be reflected back from the other end.

If the pulse is not at the frequency of operation, the results
are hardly useful at all since the response of the loading coil
is frequency dependent.

So we are back to the original question. How can the delay through
a mobile loading coil be measured at the frequency of operation
in a standing-wave antenna?
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:

If the pulse is not at the frequency of operation, the results
are hardly useful at all since the response of the loading coil
is frequency dependent.

So we are back to the original question.

It's clear that you are still back at that question. That doesn't
necessarily apply to everyone else though. What I would suggest is
that you go back, re-read, and try to undertstand the post, in
particular the parts you deleted.

73, ac6xg

Jim Kelley wrote:
It's clear that you are still back at that question. That doesn't
necessarily apply to everyone else though. What I would suggest is that
you go back, re-read, and try to undertstand the post, in particular the
parts you deleted.

What's to understand? If the measurements are not made
at the operating frequency, there is no way to prove
that they are valid.

Both the velocity factor and the characteristic
impedance of a loading coil change dramatically
with frequency.

What is wrong with using a sinusoidal traveling
wave to measure the phase shift through a coil
at its frequency of operation?
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:

It's clear that you are still back at that question. That doesn't
necessarily apply to everyone else though. What I would suggest is
that you go back, re-read, and try to undertstand the post, in
particular the parts you deleted.


What's to understand? If the measurements are not made
at the operating frequency, there is no way to prove
that they are valid.

It appears that you would benefit from an understanding of the
spectral nature of broadband pulses.

Both the velocity factor and the characteristic
impedance of a loading coil change dramatically
with frequency.

What is wrong with using a sinusoidal traveling
wave to measure the phase shift through a coil
at its frequency of operation?

You need to be able to demonstrate that attaching a load resistor to a
standing wave antenna in order to turn it into a traveling wave
antenna does not dramatically change the characteristics.

73, Jim AC6XG

Jim Kelley wrote:
It appears that you would benefit from an understanding of the spectral
nature of broadband pulses.

I understand Fourier analysis. What is the benefit
of using a lot of frequencies when you could use
the frequency of interest?

You need to be able to demonstrate that attaching a load resistor to a
standing wave antenna in order to turn it into a traveling wave antenna
does not dramatically change the characteristics.

Proving a negative is impossible. If you are asserting
that attaching a load resistor to a loading coil dramatically
changes the characteristics, the onus of proof is upon
you.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:

What is the benefit
of using a lot of frequencies when you could use
the frequency of interest?

Your memory is growing short. Do you not remember challenging me to
do that very thing - claiming it was impossible? I said I would use
pulses, then you said it wouldn't work, bla bla bla. Circuitious,
isn't it.

If you are asserting
that attaching a load resistor to a loading coil dramatically
changes the characteristics, the onus of proof is upon
you.

It should be readily apparent to just about anyone that one does in
fact significantly alter the characteristics of a system by changing
it from one which has a reflection at the end to one which doesn't.

73, ac6xg

Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

What is the benefit
of using a lot of frequencies when you could use
the frequency of interest?

Your memory is growing short. Do you not remember challenging me to do
that very thing - claiming it was impossible? I said I would use
pulses, then you said it wouldn't work, bla bla bla. Circuitious, isn't
it.

No, I'm still saying the same thing. What is the benefit
of using a lot of frequencies when you could use the
frequency of interest?

If you are asserting
that attaching a load resistor to a loading coil dramatically
changes the characteristics, the onus of proof is upon
you.

It should be readily apparent to just about anyone that one does in fact
significantly alter the characteristics of a system by changing it from
one which has a reflection at the end to one which doesn't.

So I guess it is up to you to prove that the system is
somehow non-linear in one direction only. Good luck on
that one.

A non-terminated Rhombic has both forward and reflected
currents. A terminated Rhombic has only forward current.
Exactly how is the physics of the Rhombic changed by
adding a termination resistor?
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com