Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "Peter O. Brackett"
being supremely bored wrote:


Let's
among the denizens
Most hams
our legally assigned frequency bands.
A select few
our legally assigned frequency bands
takes us
takes us
we "lurkers"
we were to take
we are
Most of us
we need
Most of us
We all
we have
our "ptical
We all


Insecure, aren't "we?"


I believe that the extant wave versus particle
"paradox" is irrelant to my following comments, assertions and questions.


Rolling up the rug before it is snapped?


Also I believe that the dividing line between transient and steady state
phenomena may be considered to be insignificant and so considered to be
irrelevant as well.


A nice elimination of a demarcation, but it says nothing of which side
of the line you are standing. Are you on the steady state side
(which, of course has never existed), or the transient state side
(that is, the only one that has ever existed)? Be careful of your
choice, as history (woops, there goes a transient) will mock you! ;-)


Frequency, or spectrum, through the Supreme Force of the Universe's gift to
us of "The Sinudoids" is intimately related to circular motion.


Most intimate relations consist of back-and-forth.


Acceleration we know is the rate of change of velocity.


Faster - faster - FASTER!


In the steady state
at DC electric charges are moving at a constant velocity.


You are confusing charge with carrier.


Thus when moving
in a straight line at constant velocity there should be no "waves" launched
or radiated, no?


Well, are you afore it? or against it?


My point here is the assertion of the real existence of DC waves either
guided or free!


Edison would have beat Tesla to transferring power over the air if
that were so. Problem is wavelength, you need infinitely long
halfwave antennas - umm, WOW inspiration! That is exactly what
Edison had. He DID beat Tesla with transferring DC power over the air
when he supplied all his customers with antennas. AND they used
guided wave principles.


Q0: Is there electromagnetic radiation (are photons emitted) from a
solenoidal (helix) carrying DC because of the centripital acceleration of
the charges?


Of course.


Q1: Do electromagnetic "waves" exist at DC, whether guided or free?


That has been historically shown.


Q2: Can incident DC "waves", whether guided or free ever be "reflected"?


Certainly.


Q3: Can a VSWR be measured (at zero frequency) on a transmission
line/waveguide that supports DC?


Break the line and hold each half with your hands.


Q4: Is the VSWR at DC related, in any way at all to the VSWR at higher
frequencies?


You just said it, frequency. Transient! For shame.


Pete, just plain crazy, none of this is reality!


You don't believe your eyes? There's a career for you heading the CIA
(or Justice Department, or Homeland Scrutiny, or... choose one) under
the current administration.


most RRAA'ers seem


Sorry about that insecurity thingy.


Q4: If the Bird can't do it


Should this be Q5 or at least Q4.1.v.1?

Anyway, simply because you cannot afford that range slug doesn't mean
the Bird cannot do it.


Q5: If waves do not exist at DC, then at what magic frequency, lets call
this frequency f(mgc), do waves cease to exist?


Insecurity now is corrupting your confidence in the topic and
polluting it with transients. As you dismissed them above, we (using
the insecure form of I) might think you are suffering from optileptic
seizures.


Q6: Below what magic frequency, lets call it f(mgc), do radiation and or
reflection phenomena stop?


A Chebyshev filter might do it.


Q7: What is the difference between a "conjugate match" and a "Zo-match" at
DC?


No conjugal relations? No back-and-forth. You can't tell the
difference?


Food for thought, eh?


Slim Fast with half the calories.


I miss dear old Reg!

Thoughts comments...


I can't think of a thing to say.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Now that's more like it.

Although I'm not sure how you make a Chebyshev with a cutoff right at DC.

tom
K0TAR