Jim Higgins wrote:

...
Now, John, in that context please find where I said the press claimed
the device was over unity.

You were claiming the news claimed it was over unity, I asked you where?

Here is your text:

Yes, I think that when the press reports on a perpetual motion machine
they're obligated (in a social contract sense vs a legal one) to point
out that such things are really impossible.

So, I ask you again, "Where did the press claim the device was over unity?"

Also, how might this device be the discovery of the century as you
suggest above? What is newly discovered here? What potential does it
hold that might qualify it for discovery of the century status? Please
try to be specific.

This has been more than over-explained in my previous posts ... if you
don't see how, open your eyes ...

JS