Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Higgins wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:12:04 -0400, Michael Coslo wrote: perhaps we should talk a while on the interesting effects that will be realized if the law of conservation of energy is "broken". What's the point... unless you think there's a liklihood the law of conservation of energy and matter as it truly exists is breakable? It's a bit of a kind nudge to some folk so that they might think about the absurdity of the idea. As far as I know, thee are only two people who question the Conservation of Energy, and they is both in this newsgroup. And nahh, I don't think it is breakable. Any law that has a zeroth Law within it is okay in my book ;^) - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB |