Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Jun, 11:56, Cecil Moore wrote:
art wrote: What is so wrong in applying a governer to all engines. The first time a driver needed to use acceleration and didn't have it to avoid a fatal accident, the requirement would be in deep dodo. O.K. so you want to be a naysayer. Assuming you are willing to accept change and adaptation that change requires let as look at the actual words without playing word games to gain a gottcha. For instance, on a long straightaway with no oncoming traffic, Ok so we say that people are going the speed limit since speeding is prohibitive. No don't play word games someone decides to pass a couple of 18-wheelers. So he accelerates to pass or if it cannot be done without breaking the speed limits he doesn't do it tho he could overtake over a period in time since the governer only regulates not stop. The car following that one decides to do the same thing. Thats O.K. he now has more time to decide on his options. Suddenly No there is no "suddenly" his vehicle will not allow him to do that tho it will allow him to ease into the traffic flow where others could accommodate his actions. ahead, a car pulls into the oncoming lane from a side road. No a car doesn't pull into fast moving traffic knowing the engine will not respond in such a dangerous manner. However other cars do not have a governor to prevent braking while the other car is moving slowly from a distance Emergency acceleration would save lives Emergency acceleration is still available over 30 miles an hour and under 65 miles an hour. Most accidents occur at un expected changes in direction and judgement and in dense areas thus giving more time for alternate action including brakes. but it's not available due to a governor. he has time, a steering wheel and brakes. Five children are killed. Imagine the outrage. Deaths occur at high speeds in general or non use of seat belts Studies have shown that setting speed limits and the use of seat belts saves lives and remember when the work day starts congestion rules for the majority. -- Don't you think you can adapt quickly in dense traffic even if the motor cycle you ride allows you to ride with impudence? Remember the intent is to reduce the use of gasolene for the Nation not to prevent people to take advantage of others on the road without looking back at the mayhem caused to others or are you wearing a straw hat again. Surely you are not promoting the burning of water as a more logical way to go while the oil supply burns in anticipation of success. 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB |