Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in news:ZLGci.19671$C96.7397
@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net: Mike Coslo wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Jim, I'm annoyed at people who assert that scientific theories are never wrong and are simply a subset of something that is more correct. Those who do are definitely not using the scientific method, are they? Well, let's take an example. There was a theory that the smallest independent organism couldn't be smaller than ~1 um. Using the scientific method, no organism smaller than that was discovered for decades. Now we have apparently discovered an independent organism 50 times smaller than the theory allowed. Was the theory right or wrong? I believe that the hypothesis was wrong. minimum size for a life form doesn't make it quite as far as a theory to me. Based on what we knew t the time, it wasn't a bad guess. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB |