Jim Kelley wrote:
I don't recall you saying that you agreed with me about that, or
anything else.

Good grief, Jim. In private email you said my article
was "great" except for two items, neither of which
had anything to do with power flow, a term you well
know I discarded years ago at your insistence.

The following statement has been in my magazine article
for three years. I put it there after your critique of my
unpublished article 3+ years ago. I have quoted the article
probably a dozen times over the past few years as a result
of your strawman accusations about what I have said.

"The term 'power flow' has been avoided in favor of 'energy
flow'. Power is a measure of that energy flow per unit time
through a plane."

The IEEE definition you refer to probably deserves a direct quote here,
too. I don't wish to be a party to their being unfairly maligned.

"power-flow vector ... giving magnitude and direction of *power*
per unit-area *propagating* in the wave." emphasis mine.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com