| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: The IEEE definition you refer to probably deserves a direct quote here, too. I don't wish to be a party to their being unfairly maligned. "power-flow vector ... giving magnitude and direction of *power* per unit-area *propagating* in the wave." emphasis mine. Also for the record: 3+ years ago, Jim Kelley convinced me that "power flow" was a misconception. I agreed with him and revised my magazine article to reflect that concept. Yet, many times since then, Jim Kelley has attempted to propagate the Big Lie that I support the concept of "power flow" all the while being fully aware that I agree with him on the subject. I have never encountered anyone before who refuses to allow me to agree with him/her. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB | |||