Cecil Moore wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:

The IEEE definition you refer to probably deserves a direct quote
here, too. I don't wish to be a party to their being unfairly maligned.


"power-flow vector ... giving magnitude and direction of *power* per
unit-area *propagating* in the wave." emphasis mine.


Also for the record: 3+ years ago, Jim Kelley convinced
me that "power flow" was a misconception. I agreed with him
and revised my magazine article to reflect that concept. Yet,
many times since then, Jim Kelley has attempted to propagate
the Big Lie that I support the concept of "power flow" all the
while being fully aware that I agree with him on the subject.
I have never encountered anyone before who refuses to allow me
to agree with him/her.

That's hilarious. You've been more than welcome to agree with me as
much as you like. As I said, I can't recall a single instance in
which you said you did. I got nothing but grief from you on the
subject - as anyone reading this group can bear witness.

73, Jim AC6XG