| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote:
"The author has endeavored to satisfy the purists in this series of articles. Apparently in response to something. Perhaps an inflammatory discussion where the author took a contrary position on the subject? The term 'power flow' has been avoided in favor of 'energy flow'. The term was avoided, with the one exception. I believe the term 'flux capacitor' was avoided entirely. Power is a measure of that energy flow per unit time through a plane. Among other things. Likewise, the EM fields in the waves do the interfering. Likewise?? Powers, treated as scalars, are incapable of interference." Should go without saying (irrespective of how you treat 'them'). the 10th time or more, I agree with you that "power flow" is probably an invalid concept and that powers cannot interfere. It's been my hope that you would agree that waves don't cause other waves to change direction, and as such interference doesn't cause energy to change direction. Such a brilliant person shouldn't hold fanciful notions of nature in my opinion. Maybe someday you'll write another paper deferring to purists on this point. 73, ac6xg |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB | |||