Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 22, 3:19 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: "The author has endeavored to satisfy the purists in this series of articles. Apparently in response to something. Perhaps an inflammatory discussion where the author took a contrary position on the subject? Maybe, but after four years it is hard to remember exactly what transpired. The glaring question is why are you still obsessing and harrassing me about an error I corrected in your favor 3+ years ago? When are you going to let that ancient history go and move on? -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB |