Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Richard,
On 8 jun, 13:41, "Richard Fry" wrote: One exception being the typical MW broadcast monopole vertical used with 120 buried radials, each 1/4-wave or more in length. This configuration produces its maximum radiation in the horizontal plane (ie, zero degrees elevation). If this was not true, then AM broadcast stations would have very few daytime listeners. Day-time listening does not require maximum radiation at 0 deg. elevation, but does require radiation at 0 deg elevation. So at that point I thing you should reconsider your statement. The ground wave fields 0.3 mile from such antenna systems have been accurately measured as far back as 1937 by Brown, Lewis and Epstein of RCA Labs, and for a vertical radiator of 60 to 90 degrees in height shown to be within a few percent of the peak, free-space field produced by a 1/2-wave dipole, at the same tx power. The frequency used in this set of tests was 3 MHz. I especially mentioned "short wave communication" and "average soil" to exclude the AM an LW broadcast propagation. In that case the pseudo Brewster angle can be that low, that (near) fields form the ground current do not cancel the direct field from the vertical radiator. Ground wave propagation loss including earth curvature will cause the h-plane field from these verticals to go to zero beyond some distance* from the transmit antenna site, but that does not mean that zero h-plane field was "launched" by this vertical radiator in the first place. *and that distance can be over 200 miles for a high power AM station on a low frequency I agree that vary close to the transmitter (you are in the transition field zone), the field strength will behave as over a perfect conducting ground plane. There is another sign that even an AM broadcast station does not have maximum radiation at 0 deg. elevation. When you check your field strength (E or H) graphs up to 60 miles (where earth curvature can be neglected) you will notice that the field strength falls of faster then with 1/distance. That would not be the case when max radiation is at 0 deg. elevation. My information shows 20 dB below 1/r (1 MHz, 100km, "good ground"), 41dB below 1/r (1 MHz, 100km, "good ground"), source: "The services textbook of radio, 1958, volume 5 page 442. For average soil, and especially rocky like ground, the field strength will be significantly lower. Probably your material does also treat "height gain factors" Then you will see that above a certain height, field strength increases with increasing height (indication of more gain under that elevation). Best regards, Wim PA3DJS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Safety ground versus RF ground for a 2nd Floor shack | Antenna | |||
Reflection Loss | Antenna | |||
Transforming your simple Ground Rod into a Ground Anchor : Is It Worth The Work ? - You Decide ! | Shortwave | |||
Ground Or Not To Ground Receiving Antenna In Storm ? | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna |