![]() |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
In article t3ali.3392$Y_3.570@trnddc04, Woody wrote:
Well.. a million thanks for that. Quite a cool history lesson as well. So now I'm looking for an SEA tuner... LOL... Listen, that all makes perfect sense but just to clarify, a.) now I know why that triton did so poorly when tested. We calc'd 1/2 wavelength for the longwire, and b.) Again, for continuity and clarity of this thread for future surfers...... what then, considering our discussed auto-tuners, would be the optimal length for a longwire that would be used for amateur/MARS, 3-30MHz? Pick 1/2wavelength on say 2.8Mhz and just cut it? Or calc 1/2wavelength on the lowest and add 5% or some arbitrary odd number?? Which plan will offer the least chance of dropping a 1/2wl further up the band on a desired frequency? I think you'll need to run a a simple calculation, based on the frequencies you actually want to use. What you'll want, is a wire whose length is not particularly close to any multiple of 1/2 wavelength, on any frequency you want to use. A wire which would match easily on 80 meters (e.g. 1/4 wavelength long) would be a bad choice if you want to work on 40 meters as well, as it'd be 1/2 wavelength long. A simple program or spreadsheet ought to be able to do the necessary calculations... try every wire length from 66 feet to 132 feet and see if you can find a length which is a comfortable percentage away from an even multiple of 1/2 wavelength on each frequency. Or, alternatively, iterate through each frequency, calculate the 1/2-wavelength multiples, and "blacklist" every possible length which is too close to these multiples. For what it's worth, SGC sells a longwire antenna 60' in length, which they say works well on both lower and higher HF bands. It might or might not be a good choice for MARS frequencies. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
Bruce in Alaska wrote in
: Bruce, An interesting post overall, but ... System. All these tuners NEED a Low Impedance RF Ground to work against, as well as a Longwire who's length is SPECIFICALLY set up to put the 1/2 Wavelength Point in a non used portion of the Spectrum. They will NOT tune within 2% of the Natural 1/2 Wavelenth point of the Longwire connected, where Antenna Impedances near Infinity. The "rules" above are offered without definition or explanation, so they don't really raise the art. Manufacturer's "rules" and explanations are often inconsistent. For example, some state a minimum length that can be tuned on say 3.6MHz, and it is often around 3m, yet they rabbit on about avoiding half wave resonances in the wire to avoid high voltage at the feed point. The feed point voltage on a 3m whip at 3.6MHz is likely to be much higher than a 10m whip at its first parallel resonance. Owen |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
|
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
Dave Platt wrote:
In article t3ali.3392$Y_3.570@trnddc04, Woody wrote: Well.. a million thanks for that. Quite a cool history lesson as well. So now I'm looking for an SEA tuner... LOL... Listen, that all makes perfect sense but just to clarify, a.) now I know why that triton did so poorly when tested. We calc'd 1/2 wavelength for the longwire, and b.) Again, for continuity and clarity of this thread for future surfers...... what then, considering our discussed auto-tuners, would be the optimal length for a longwire that would be used for amateur/MARS, 3-30MHz? Pick 1/2wavelength on say 2.8Mhz and just cut it? Or calc 1/2wavelength on the lowest and add 5% or some arbitrary odd number?? Which plan will offer the least chance of dropping a 1/2wl further up the band on a desired frequency? I think you'll need to run a a simple calculation, based on the frequencies you actually want to use. What you'll want, is a wire whose length is not particularly close to any multiple of 1/2 wavelength, on any frequency you want to use. A wire which would match easily on 80 meters (e.g. 1/4 wavelength long) would be a bad choice if you want to work on 40 meters as well, as it'd be 1/2 wavelength long. A simple program or spreadsheet ought to be able to do the necessary calculations... try every wire length from 66 feet to 132 feet and see if you can find a length which is a comfortable percentage away from an even multiple of 1/2 wavelength on each frequency. Or, alternatively, iterate through each frequency, calculate the 1/2-wavelength multiples, and "blacklist" every possible length which is too close to these multiples. For what it's worth, SGC sells a longwire antenna 60' in length, which they say works well on both lower and higher HF bands. It might or might not be a good choice for MARS frequencies. The other strategy is to use two wires of appropriately different lengths connected together at the feedpoint. (the SGC whips do this, for instance).. Space the wires some distance apart (a few inches would do).. What this does is put multiple bumps in the impedance curve and eliminates the pathological cases where you have very high Z when the (one) wire is a half wavelength or multiple thereof. At those frequencies where one wire *is* a half wavelength, and presents a high Z, the other one is likely NOT a multiple of a half wavelength, and so, will present a reasonable impedance. Sure, they interact (as folks making multiband dipoles find when trying to cut and trim), but all that really does is shift the resonances around. An interesting question would be what is the optimum ratio of lengths.. probably something like 1:1.618 or 1:2.7183 |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
Owen Duffy wrote:
Bruce in Alaska wrote in : Bruce, An interesting post overall, but ... System. All these tuners NEED a Low Impedance RF Ground to work against, as well as a Longwire who's length is SPECIFICALLY set up to put the 1/2 Wavelength Point in a non used portion of the Spectrum. They will NOT tune within 2% of the Natural 1/2 Wavelenth point of the Longwire connected, where Antenna Impedances near Infinity. The "rules" above are offered without definition or explanation, so they don't really raise the art. Manufacturer's "rules" and explanations are often inconsistent. For example, some state a minimum length that can be tuned on say 3.6MHz, and it is often around 3m, yet they rabbit on about avoiding half wave resonances in the wire to avoid high voltage at the feed point. The feed point voltage on a 3m whip at 3.6MHz is likely to be much higher than a 10m whip at its first parallel resonance. there's a goodly amount of empiricism in these rules of thumb from the mfr, too. If you start to analyze it, there's all sorts of issues that crop up in the analysis: the heating and/or breakdown of the Ls and Cs inside the box, for instance (and, because it's a binary sequence with components with 20% tolerance, the voltages (for L) or currents (for C) don't divide evenly... the big Cs take more of the current than the small ones). And then, there's the whole thermal management issue, and "real ratings" of the component vs catalog vs derating. The tesla coil folks regularly run low ESR extended foil polypropylene capacitors (typical 0.15 uF at 2kV) at 2 or 3 times rated voltage at a few hundred kHz, as long as the rms current is within bounds. But they benefit from a fair amount of destructive testing and failure analysis by a coiling hobbyist with access to the appropriate gear. Owen |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
In article , Owen Duffy wrote: A simple program or spreadsheet ought to be able to do the necessary calculations... try every wire length from 66 feet to 132 feet and see if you can find a length which is a comfortable percentage away from an even multiple of 1/2 wavelength on each frequency. Or, You probably mean't any integral multiple of a half wave. You're right... integral multiple of a half-wavelength, or even multiples of a quarter-wavelength are two alternative ways for stating the lengths to be avoided (high feedpoint Z). alternatively, iterate through each frequency, calculate the 1/2-wavelength multiples, and "blacklist" every possible length which is too close to these multiples. I have done just that, and searched for "sweet" wire lengths that aren't within say 5% of band edge for all HF bands. It sounds like a solution to the problem doesn't it. (5% implies that you have a pretty determinate scenario, which is a big assumption. IIRC 10%+ will not give a practical result on the higher bands.) Problem is that it probably unecessarily constrains the solution. Entirely possible! The input impedance and the feed point voltage of an end fed wire at its higher parallel resonances falls, so that whilst you might want to avoid the first such resonance, the impedance (and feed point voltage) at the third or higher resonance might well be low enough to not worry about it. And, even if it was a bit high, you might not need to be more than a couple of percent away from it to get it down to a length that might work. Odds are that some amount of experimentation is going to be required, at any given installation, to find a wire length which tunes up well with these ATUs. The orientation of the wire (vertical, inverted-L, etc.), height about ground, presence of trees and metallic objects, and (perhaps most importantly) the details of the ATU's grounding system, are likely to change the impedances around enough to make the "textbook" answers less than completely effective. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
Hi Owen. 5% was just a number picked out at random by me for clarification
of my question. So you wouldn't want to share your 'sweet' findings, would you?? thanks! W "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... I have done just that, and searched for "sweet" wire lengths that aren't within say 5% of band edge for all HF bands. It sounds like a solution to the problem doesn't it. (5% implies that you have a pretty determinate scenario, which is a big assumption. IIRC 10%+ will not give a practical result on the higher bands.) Owen |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
"Woody" wrote in news:hYdli.29709$BT3.8034@trnddc06:
Hi Owen. 5% was just a number picked out at random by me for clarification of my question. So you wouldn't want to share your 'sweet' findings, would you?? thanks! W, I have had a quick look for the spreadsheet and Perl scripts, but haven't found them. I am sure I have them, but haven't filed them in an ordered way apparently, I think that technically is lost... or galloping senility. The reason I didn't publish them as is at the time is is that they are an incomplete picture. Have a look at the article at http://www.vk1od.net/InvertedL/InvertedL.htm which describes an InvertedL at approximately one of those "sweet" lengths (~26m). In fact, the length was juggled to avoid excessive feedpoint voltage on all bands. Another of the "sweet" lengths is half that at 13m, and the voltage plot is rougly scaled proportionately in frequency. You will see from Fig 1 that the voltage peaks at higher frequency parallel resonances are less an issue than the first and second resonances (you can't see from the graphs, but ~10kV and 3kV respectively). Of course, none of this discussion addresses the pattern issues at the higher frequencies. As far as the earth system goes, it impacts efficiency of the system. It is my view that the earth only needs to be good enough that its loss is an acceptably low portion of the transmitter power. The shorter the radiator in wavelengths, the lower its Rr and therefore the lower the earth resistance for comparable efficiency. If you look at Fig 4 of the article, you will see that Rr is 100 ohms or greater above 5MHz, so the loss of an earth system resistance of say 30 ohms is near insignificant, but at 80m where the length is relatively short, you need a better earth for good efficiency. Don't agonise over it too much, and treat the Rules of Thumb as ROT until you understand the underlying assumptions and caveats. Owen W "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... I have done just that, and searched for "sweet" wire lengths that aren't within say 5% of band edge for all HF bands. It sounds like a solution to the problem doesn't it. (5% implies that you have a pretty determinate scenario, which is a big assumption. IIRC 10%+ will not give a practical result on the higher bands.) Owen |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
"Woody" wrote in news:hYdli.29709$BT3.8034@trnddc06:
Hi Owen. 5% was just a number picked out at random by me for clarification of my question. So you wouldn't want to share your 'sweet' findings, would you?? thanks! I had a dig around through a few thousand spreadsheets... and found it. 9.05m, 12.6m, 18.3m, 26.4m, 33.3m, 44.9m. If you want to cover 60m, leave the 26.4 out of the list. Did someone mention 60' (18.3m), it is in the list, but it is more critical than 26.4 or 12.6. As noted in my earlier post, if you want to be 10% or more away from n half waves on all bands, there is no solution. These calcs don't consider proximity of objects that may shift the tuning. My advice still stands that the higher order parallel resonances aren't such an issue, so this method unnecessarily constrains the solution.. Owen |
Need help... End-fed, long wire or ????
Yes, the history of the autotuners is fascinating...
The discussion of integral half waves, parallel resonance impedences, ground impedences, etc., is meat and potatos for antenna freaks like me... BTW, in the older ARRL handbooks is a table of guy wire lengths (for towers) that avoid resonances in the ham bands... Those lengths would make an excellent guide for the length of a random wire antenna... It might also be in the new editions, but I haven't looked at one in recent years.. Anyway, that table will give you a good starting point... B U T , what I want you to do is to simply either cobble up an L match, or pick up a tuner (any tuner, automatic or not), run some wire any length through those trees, and get on the air! If the tuner has problems with any particular band, change the length of the wire by 4 to 12 feet until it tunes OK... Once you have a working antenna you can spend time and energy gilding the lily with just the 'perfect' length and configuration... Don't waste time over analyzing - pick a tuner, throw up some wire and ground radials, and operate... A local ham who lives in a trailor park is closing in on 300 countries confirmed and his only antenna for all this is a single multiband vertical, 21 feet tall, disguised as a flag pole... Just do it... cheers ... denny |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com