Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.
---
Reg, G4FGQ

Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.
---
Reg, G4FGQ



huh?

uh huh

Yuri Blanarovich wrote:

Reg wrote:
Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.

huh? uh huh

I assume what Reg is saying is: The antenna's radiation pattern is
determined by phasing interference (superposition) of EM wave components
in the far field. In some places, they tend to reinforce and in other
places they tend to cancel. An example might be a one wavelength
vertical monopole.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Fugettaboutit!
No need to touch that one. You haven't even mentioned trigonometry and
locations. :-)
It is NOT the antenna('s radiaton pattern)! I wasted 46 years of my hamming
life trying to figure out antennas.
I should have kept my trigonometry books. Uh huuuuh

73 BUm


Yuri Blanarovich wrote:

Reg wrote:
Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.

huh? uh huh

I assume what Reg is saying is: The antenna's radiation pattern is
determined by phasing interference (superposition) of EM wave components
in the far field. In some places, they tend to reinforce and in other
places they tend to cancel. An example might be a one wavelength
vertical monopole.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Fugettaboutit!
No need to touch that one. You haven't even mentioned trigonometry and
locations. :-)
It is NOT the antenna('s radiaton pattern)! I wasted 46 years of my hamming
life trying to figure out antennas.
I should have kept my trigonometry books. Uh huuuuh
Cecil and Yuri wrote,

73 BUm


Yuri Blanarovich wrote:

Reg wrote:
Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.

huh? uh huh

I assume what Reg is saying is: The antenna's radiation pattern is
determined by phasing interference (superposition) of EM wave components
in the far field. In some places, they tend to reinforce and in other
places they tend to cancel. An example might be a one wavelength
vertical monopole.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp




Poor Cecil, poor Yuri! You fellows have just been taken in by a
fiendish Englishman.
73,
Tom Donaly

Damn, Damn, Damn, Damn, Damn !

Sorry about the typo.

For 'radiation' read 'elevation'.
---
Reg, G4FGQ

========================

Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.
---
Reg, G4FGQ

Gibberish, in any case.

RF

Visit http://rfry.org for FM broadcast RF system papers.

_________________

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Damn, Damn, Damn, Damn, Damn !

Sorry about the typo.

For 'radiation' read 'elevation'.
---
Reg, G4FGQ

========================

Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical
plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.
---
Reg, G4FGQ

Reg wrote,

Remember, it is NOT the antenna's radiation pattern in the vertical plane
which determines radiation angles.

It is trigonometry and Tx and Rx geographical locations.
---
Reg, G4FGQ


Reg, you know full well that the above statement requires too much
from the heads of the people it's aimed at. Isn't the causing of headaches
in other people a form of assault?
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH