Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed" wrote in message .92... ." The answer to the question would seem to be that it would not work very well just due to experiance. The swr would be off the charts and a rig that had an internal tuner would not tune that kind of antenna over that frequency range if the swr had to be under 3:1. Also the loss in the coax due to the high swr would be very large.. Well, that was my original surmise of the situation. I was just trying to have someone with expertize on EZNEC run the antenna at the three frequencies listed in order to have the feedpoint SWR calculated for each of those three frequencies. So far, no one, except Owen, has come even close. Hi Ed Did you miss my post??? Or, did misunderstand your question. This antenna is so easy to model with Roy's EZNEC that I suspect it would be an excellant "first try" for you. Send Roy a few $$ and you will soon realize that you have spent some money well. I'd be willing to show you how to model it, and I am a novice user of EZNEC. Your question certainly doesnt require an expert on EZNEC to be answered very clearly. Jerry KD6JDJ I can work with the figures Owen provided for the one frequency ( 3975) and do the rest of the calculations manually to determine the SWR on that frequency, but had hoped for actual feedpoint SWR data for all three actual transmit frequencies listed. Thanks to all. Ed |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Linear predictive coefficient computation | CB | |||
[help] eznec\4 pro | Antenna | |||
EZNEC ARRL and EZNEC 4 Demo: Setting default folders | Antenna | |||
EZNEC Help | Antenna | |||
Help with EZNEC...... | Antenna |