Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
measuring cable loss
"Jim Lux" wrote in message ... Jimmie D wrote: I assume you're not looking for tenth of a dB precision? Jim Actually yes I am..Power must be maintained +- 1db at the antenna. You've got a bit of a challenge, then.. although +/- 1 dB (is that a 1 sigma or a 3 sigma or a absoulate max min spec?) might not require a tenth of a dB precision. 1 dB is 25% 1% is 0.04dB (measuring power at 1 GHz to 0.1dB absolute is moderately challenging, especially outdoors) For reference, an Agilent E4418 is specified at +/-0.6% (25C +/- 10 degrees).. plus you have a linearity spec which can range from 1% to 4% depending on the relative levels of the reference and unknown. A good return loss measurement with a decent PNA (like an E8363) should get you down in the sub 0.1dB transmission measurement with overall loss in the 0 to 20dB range, so the measurement is clearly feasible at some level. The same piece of gear, measuring reflection coefficient (i.e. the put a short or open at the other end, and measure mag(rho) and work back to loss)... you said you have about 6dB return loss, so that's a reflection coefficient (at the analyzer) of about 0.5, and for 2GHz, the uncertainty would be about 0.01 (out of the 0.5), or, call it 2%... again, about a 0.1 dB uncertainty. OTOH, that's a $50K piece of test gear, sitting in a lab at 25C +/- 1C There's also the temperature coefficient of the coax to worry about. Copper has a temperature coefficient of 0.4%/degree C. A 10 degree change in temperature is a 4% change in resistance (0.2dB), and the resistance is a big part of the loss (dielectric loss changes differently, and you'd have to worry about the dimensional changes too). In any case, measuring the loss by terminating it in a reflection is probably the easiest way, and potentially the most precise, because you can have the source and the measurement at the same location. If you tried to measure it by transmission loss (put the source at one end and the detector at the other) you have the problem of the stability of the source. In a bridge type scheme (which the reflection technique is) you can essentially compare between the unknown (your cable) and a standard, and adjust the standard until they match, so the variations in the power level of the source cancel out (or use something that inherently measures the ratio of the powers). Something like the LP-100 wattmeter can probably make the measurement. It's good to 5% typical, and can do ratioed/match measurements to much better. I don't know if it can go to 1 GHz, though. Something like the Anritsu SiteMaster (like the S311D) can do this for sure(after all, it's what it was designed to do.. measure coax on towers) http://www.us.anritsu.com/downloads/...1410-00419.pdf If you need to measure loss on the fly, it's a bit trickier, but one way is to put a deliberate small mismatch at the end (i.e. you put a 10 dB directional coupler in the line at the antenna end, with the coupled port terminated into a short). This reflects a known -20dB back down the line. You look for changes in the amount of reflected power. Obviously, if the antenna changes it's reflection, you have to separate that out. There are clever techniques for this too (like having the coupler terminate in a switch that is either a load or a short). This kind of thing is pretty common on antenna measurement ranges, where you need to remove the effects of the feed cable from the measurement. Jimmie Sounds like using my network analyser to measure return loss at the TX in an envoromentally stabalized building is going to be a lot better than taking my HP power meter up on the antenna in the middle of the night to measure the power level at the end of the cable. Jimmie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
measuring cable loss
Sounds like using my network analyser to measure return loss at the TX in an envoromentally stabalized building is going to be a lot better than taking my HP power meter up on the antenna in the middle of the night to measure the power level at the end of the cable. you betcha.. But you still have the tempco of the cable to agonize about. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measuring quarter wave cable length with HP 8405A | Antenna | |||
Calculating Coaxial Cable Loss | Antenna | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Scanner | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Shortwave | |||
Measuring small inductances using a return loss bridge | Homebrew |