Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:51:54 -0400, RJG wrote:
I bought 2 Slinky's to put a Slinky antenna together, and would love to get comments and suggestions, (construction detail tips, care and feeding, etc.) from anyone who has tried this type of antenna before. I live in a second floor apartment and have limited HF antenna options. I would love to hear recommendations for any other HF antenna designs that would work well in this type of setting. Classic wire-wound, air-cooled resistors. You could do better with the various 1 meter diameter loops sold commercially. Some might suggest mobile screwdriver designs clamped to your balcony railing, but that isn't really the same sort of metal bulk equivalent to a, say, Chevy Suburban which would be the principal radiator. On a comparable price basis, the loops will be a better investment for 40M and up (I don't recall any that suggest they cover 80M and certainly 160M is beyond the realm). A simple test for small (for their wavelength) antennas is to measure their bandwidth. We will take the Slinkies as an example (and certainly cheap enough to test this statement, and to see how they perform both). A small antenna that would be efficient will also exhibit a high Q. The loops mentioned, as I recall, generally exhibit 5 to 10KHz bandwidth. For the most part, they exhibit some of the better efficiencies (although not as high as a standard dipole). The slinkies stand to have a wider bandwidth due to their loss (small wire AND steel wire). Initially, this may seem to be quite attractive, and if you ignore the loss, they may serve your purpose quite well (SWR and Loss are not always limitations to enjoying the hobby). As I said, cheap enough to simply plunge on and worry about efficiency later. Tune-up can be as simple as stretching/compressing the coils until you achieve a match (at least that has been my experience). If the frequency is too low, add more slinkies. If you want to beef up the efficiency with a slinky, make it(them) part(s) of a center loaded element(s). Unfortunately that means more room than you have in your apartment situation. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|