Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Nate Bargmann wrote: I'm curious whether anyone has run an NEC type of analysis on the Hustler G7-144, and/or the G6-144 antennas. I'd like a gain/pattern comparison to a 1/2 wave vertically oriented dipole. However, I can't find any manufacturer pattern plots to compare these antennas. I put together a couple of NEC models for the G7-144 a year or two ago. If I recall correctly, this antenna is composed of three 5/8-wave radiators in a collinear arrangement (stacked one above another) separated by relatively short inductive loading/phasing coils. It has quarter-wave radials at the bottom and is fed at the base through a tapped coil. I did two different models - one using shorted transmission-line stubs as the phasing elements, and another using lumped inductances. With the stub lengths, and the inductance values tweaked to give the correct current-phase relationships in the 5/8-wave radiating sections, the two models produced almost indistinguishable results in the pattern analysis, and a gain figure which matched the manufacturer's claims quite well. I can't claim that the models are precisely correct, but I'd guess that they're fairly close. The pattern seemed reasonably clean... most of the energy went straight out towards the horizon. There were minor lobes upwards and downwards at an angle of around 45 degrees, as one would expect from a 5/8-wave radiator. I didn't see any systematic "squint" (up-tilt or down-tilt) in the pattern. The "donut" of the pattern was significantly shallower than that of a half-wave reference dipole... not s surprise. I added a random wire down from the feedpoint to simulate the "RF on the outside of the coax or on the mast" issue, and found that there was little current and little effect on the pattern... according to the models, at least, the quarter-wave radials do a pretty effective job in decoupling the antenna from the mast and feedline. I compared these results against those for another antenna design I've been considering for our repeater - a pair of "plumber's delight" copper-pipe 5/4-wave extended double Zepp antennas, stacked one above the other (about a quarter-wave separating the tips of their inner arms), fed in phase. The results were roughly comparable. I've got the models on my laptop PC at home, I think... if I can find 'em I'll email them, and perhaps some results plots to you. The biggest concern I have about the G7-144 isn't its pattern - it's some aspects of its construction. The one we're using went bongo after a few years up in the weather - the repeater began suffering from extremely severe desense - it was so bad as to render the repeater unusable unless you were within a mile or so of it. We temporarily swapped the Hustler for a simple J-pole and got back most of the performance. When we tore down the G7-144 we found that the bottom end of the base-matching/feed coil was high-Z from ground. The construction of the antenna base depends on a heavy-gauge press fitting between two sections of aluminum to establish the connection between the base of the coil and the N connector, and about five years of weathering (in a fairly mild climate) had led to enough oxidation to allow the connection to go open-circuit at DC! I believe that there were also some connections which were done with ring terminals and rivets. The antenna actually worked, in the sense that it transmitted and showed a low SWR, but there was enough micro-arcing and rectification taking place in the oxidized connections to create plenty of broadband noise which was swamping the receiver and leading to many dB of desensitization. Our chief metalworking guy tore the whole thing apart, and rebuilt the base with a better N connector and a pair of soldered connections between the coil base and the ground shell of the N connector. He also cleaned up all of the sliding-tubing connections between the radiators and phasing coils, roughened them up a bit, gooped them with a conductive anti-oxidant compound, re-fit and re-tuned them, then drilled through the tubing and riveted them together, and then used heat-shrink tubing over all of the phasing-coil connections. I think he believes in wearing suspenders, a belt, *and* duct tape :-) We put it back up, and found that the desense was down to undetectable levels. It's been up in the air for 18 months now, with nary a problem. We're going to have to move our antenna tower in a few years, and at that point we'll probably retire the G7-144 and replace it with either a stacked pair of EDZ antennas (homebrew) or a stacked folded dipole system (commercial). Both of the candidate designs use fully-soldered or fully-welded radiator construction... they're DC-grounded and would be free of sliding or press-fit connections which could oxidize and degrade over time. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
radiation pattern of log-periodic antenna | Antenna | |||
Radiation Pattern Measurements | Antenna | |||
Measuring beam radiation pattern | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
Visualizing radiation pattern | Antenna |