Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 24, 12:04 pm, Michael Coslo wrote:
Build one of those bad boys, put it on an antenna range, test it out and let the decibels fall where they may. All else is just netnews s/n. I've told him that a hundred times... He won't listen. How does he expect anyone to give his antenna much of a chance when the "theory" he provides is generally caca, and he refuses to build an actual working antenna to demo and test? What a load of @#$%... Art and his groupies just don't get it. It's not that anyone is against new ideas, antennas, etc, ad nausium. Just don't feed us a turd and call it a steak if one can't even take the trouble to build a working example to test. :/ If I had some new whiz bang antenna cooked up, I would build and test one first, and then talk about it later if it actually was proven to work. Art goes the other route. He talks a great storm, but nothing is ever produced to actually test in the real world. As far as I see it, that is no way to live. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another act of Republican "these laws are for everyone but us": | Shortwave | |||
SCANNER EAVESDROPPING LAWS | Swap | |||
Scanning laws around the world? | Scanner | |||
Scanner Laws | Scanner |