Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JIMMIE" wrote in message ps.com... wrote: On Oct 2, 2:06 pm, "Jimmie D" wrote: The small theroretical gain advantage that a 5/8wl radiator has over a 1/2wl radiator is dependent on it having a very good counterpoise. However one may be able to fabricate a 5/8wl antenna with a couterpoise matched to the feedline with a stub made of metal tubing. Jimmie The best "counterpoise" for a 5/8 radiator is a set of 5/8 radials... But in that case, it's more of a collinear. Myself, I think a 5/8 radiator should always be used with a 5/8 lower section of you want the full performance. IE: dual 5/8 collinear. Anything else is a perversion... :/ My 2nd choice would be to use 3/4 wave radials. 1/2 wave radials would be useless. 1/4 wave radials are semi useless, and give a lousy pattern.. MK I like the 5/8th on VHF because it has noticably more gain than a 1/4wl groundplane and in my opinon is easier to build and match than an end-fed 1/2wl antenna. Jimmie How can it get any easier than what I described in my article about the 2x4 based 1/2 wave J-Pole with the unconnected 1/4 wave matching stub placed 4" from the 1/2 wave radiator? You slide the alligator clips up and down the two elements until the SWR matches, then you're finished. Of course, building a similar antenna for outdoor use will require some experimentation, but it shouldn't be that difficult to accomplish. The performance was just fine as far as I was concerned, working distant 30 mile away repeaters with ten watts or less from INSIDE the house (steel siding - no less) and obtaining full quieting on the repeater. Ed Cregger, NM2K |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|