New antenna
|
New antenna
art wrote:
www.newswise.com/articles/view/532935 Yeah, ole' Robert Vincent is a sore spot in the NG, I'd imagine. Made A$$'es out of all the "experts" and continues to do so ... sometimes there is real justice. Regards, JS |
New antenna
On 9 Oct, 19:35, John Smith wrote:
art wrote: www.newswise.com/articles/view/532935 Yeah, ole' Robert Vincent is a sore spot in the NG, I'd imagine. Made A$$'es out of all the "experts" and continues to do so ... sometimes there is real justice. Regards, JS Yup, the experts were not experts after all just phony's. Ofcourse we now have to wait for comments like " I knew that all the time", "I have been using that method for years", "that was invented by Mantovani a hundred yeard ago but he just didn't get around to printing it" Art |
New antenna
art wrote:
... a hundred yeard ago but he just didn't get around to printing it" Art Art: You forgot: "Although the Navy meant well, it's test data was in error!" :-) Regards, JS |
New antenna
On 10 Oct, 09:04, John Smith wrote:
art wrote: ... a hundred yeard ago but he just didn't get around to printing it" Art Art: You forgot: "Although the Navy meant well, it's test data was in error!" :-) Regards, JS What was the error? The antenna feed line is part of the antenna system is it not? If it radiates then what is the problem? Art Art |
New antenna
art wrote:
On 9 Oct, 19:35, John Smith wrote: art wrote: www.newswise.com/articles/view/532935 Yeah, ole' Robert Vincent is a sore spot in the NG, I'd imagine. Made A$$'es out of all the "experts" and continues to do so ... sometimes there is real justice. Regards, JS Yup, the experts were not experts after all just phony's. Ofcourse we now have to wait for comments like " I knew that all the time", "I have been using that method for years", "that was invented by Mantovani a hundred yeard ago but he just didn't get around to printing it" Art The patent, US 7187335, is a real hoot. I especially like the part where he describes doubling the bandwidth by adding a parasitic winding intertwined with the base coil helix. Do you suppose his antenna is in equilibrium? Could proper application of Artsian-Gaussian theory improve it even more? :D 73, Gene W4SZ |
New antenna
On 10 Oct, 10:47, Gene Fuller wrote:
art wrote: On 9 Oct, 19:35, John Smith wrote: art wrote: www.newswise.com/articles/view/532935 Yeah, ole' Robert Vincent is a sore spot in the NG, I'd imagine. Made A$$'es out of all the "experts" and continues to do so ... sometimes there is real justice. Regards, JS Yup, the experts were not experts after all just phony's. Ofcourse we now have to wait for comments like " I knew that all the time", "I have been using that method for years", "that was invented by Mantovani a hundred yeard ago but he just didn't get around to printing it" Art The patent, US 7187335, is a real hoot. I especially like the part where snip Do you suppose his antenna is in equilibrium? Could proper application of Artsian-Gaussian theory improve it even more? :D 73, Gene W4SZ- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gene, you are just showing your ignorance of physics. What is it about the word "equilibrium" that you can't understand? How on earth can you say you are educated in physics? How is it that you do not have an understanding of Gauss? Or are you trying to be funny with the word "Artisian-Gaussian" like the rest of your fellow school boys? What manner of man are you trying to project of yourself to other readers of this group, a comedian or an ignoramous or somebody with senior moments in continuos series? You never seem to have anything to say that is informative so why the need to draw attention to yourself. What is missing in your life such that you have to mimic a fool that want's to be funny in the absence of a education of any sort? Back to the Vincent antenna, he has designed an antenna that is shorter than that known before. You didn't come up with it he did. He has a patent based on his claims and not for the introductory writing.An engineer in automobiles has shown interest in it where you have never gained outside interests in any thing you have done in your life time. The input impedance is an advantage over similar antennas and at the same time not requiring a ground plain without being a problem to the transmitter. He is also radiating well in comparison to the height of antenna and the radiating system has the appearance of being efficient. Vincent has come up with something new and because of the 'not invented in my backyard' you want to diminish his achievements. But you can't diminish his achievments without providing an engineering analysis and for that you do not have the necessary education. Maybe it is better that you continue to mimic a fool that wants to be funny but better to become a succes at that at home before showing off your skills in public even tho you are getting laughter, not with you but at you. Art Art |
New antenna
Gene Fuller wrote:
... The patent, US 7187335, is a real hoot. I especially like the part where he describes doubling the bandwidth by adding a parasitic winding intertwined with the base coil helix. Do you suppose his antenna is in equilibrium? Could proper application of Artsian-Gaussian theory improve it even more? :D 73, Gene W4SZ What? You don't see cutting the capacitance between winding turns as causing some measurable effect which in turn affects a property of the antenna proper? Thicker conductor(s) usually means a measurable gain in bandwith, with a parasitic element in such close proximity to the major element, a gain in bandwidth is not that difficult to propose and attempt to prove/disprove. Regards, JS |
New antenna
art wrote:
... What was the error? The antenna feed line is part of the antenna system is it not? If it radiates then what is the problem? Art Art I have a 1/4 wave counterpoise available to the 1/2 DLM I am using. However, I have a high value choke to ward off radiation from the coax ... Regards, JS |
New antenna
On 10 Oct, 20:51, John Smith wrote:
art wrote: ... What was the error? The antenna feed line is part of the antenna system is it not? If it radiates then what is the problem? Art Art I have a 1/4 wave counterpoise available to the 1/2 DLM I am using. However, I have a high value choke to ward off radiation from the coax ... Regards, JS What is wrong with the coax radiating? Art |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com