![]() |
Question on dipole SWR problem
Tam/WB2TT wrote:
If I had a huge metal roof like that, I would be tempted to try one of the shortened verticals. The kind that requires radials - which would be your roof. Unfortunately, a vertical makes a poor NVIS antenna. . . . Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Question on dipole SWR problem
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:07:40 -0400, "Tam/WB2TT"
wrote: I guess I should have called it a transformer. Although, it could be a balun, like they use on output stages of RF amplifiers; 5.6 Ohm balanced to 50 Ohm unbalanced. Hi Tam, Lift one wire from ground and you've got that BalBal. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Question on dipole SWR problem
Ed G wrote in
.89: Ed, The way in which you dealt with the transition from the open wire feedline to the SGC237 unbalanced tuner is relevant. As is whether or not you bonded the tuner 'ground' terminal to the roof. Your description is short on relevant detail. Owen SG237 tuner is not "bonded" to the roof ground, SGC does not suggest doing such a thing, and in this case, it would not be possible anyway since the "ground" side of the tuner is also one side of the balanced antenna feedpoint. The SG237 is feeding about 14' of 600 ohm open ladder line, spaced about 1 foot off the aluminum mast, up to the feedpoint of the antenna, a 75M dipole ( 61' per leg). The tuner is sitting in a plastic box, about 1 foot off the roof. Ed The feedline is doing more than transporting energy to the dipole centre, it almost certainly carries a significant common mode current and in that case is just as much a part of the radiating system as the dipole itself. So, isn't the coax and control line to the SG237 carrying current mode RF current, ie contibuting to radiation. Inch by inch, the detail unfolds. Owen |
Question on dipole SWR problem
"Ed G" Huckleberry_ large SWR when operating below about 3825 KHz. We recently replaced the entire antenna assy with a 122' half wave dipole, fed with 600 ohm ladder line to an SGC antenna coupler at the base of the center mast. The SGC 237 coupler tunes the antenna well above 3825, and all other bands, too. However, we still exhibit a very high SWR when going below about 3825 and the tuner fails to tune... in fact the Radio's power drops way down, possibly preventing the tuner from working properly. A different radio shows the same problem. Ed, sounds like your radios are into VSWR turndown from the inability of the tuner to match at the low end. It could be that the Z at 3825 is going high which a lot of tuners can't handle--or could be very low, same problem, no match. Try adding some more length to the dipole if you can and see if it tunes better at the low end. Even if you only drape pieces down at the ends would help if you can't extend more horizontally. 73,Bill W0BVR |
Question on dipole SWR problem
"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Tam/WB2TT wrote: If I had a huge metal roof like that, I would be tempted to try one of the shortened verticals. The kind that requires radials - which would be your roof. Unfortunately, a vertical makes a poor NVIS antenna. . . . Roy Lewallen, W7EL Still, a waste of a ground plane. Tam/WB2TT |
Question on dipole SWR problem
Owen Duffy wrote in
: .... So, isn't the coax and control line to the SG237 carrying current mode RF current, ie contibuting to radiation. I will answer my own question... In the absence of an effective device to prevent common mode feedline current, your configuration where one side of the ladder line connects to the 'ground' side of the nominally unbalanced tuner, and that same tuner terminal connects to the outside of the feedline coax and control wires (at RF), then you have a continuous RF common mode path to wherever the coax and control lines connect and so on, they are just as much a part of your radiator as the dipole wire. Analysis of the 122' entre fed wire in isolation of the rest of the antenna system are inadequate in explaining the difficulties you encounter. Owen |
Question on dipole SWR problem
If I had a huge metal roof like that, I would be tempted to try one of the shortened verticals. The kind that requires radials - which would be your roof. That is something we had not considered. Will keep that in mind. Tnx. You are running coax from the tuner to the shack, right; with just the 14 feet of ladder line? Yes, 14' ladderline from tuner to antenna center. About 100 ' of RG-213 on roof and another 30' or so going down to station inside building. We have a coax choke balun located in line on the roof about 8' before the coax goes down in the building. Ed |
Question on dipole SWR problem
Is the 237 designed for balanced antennas or single random wires, or either? bob k5qwg Not sure what SGC recommends regarding balanced antennas.... will review their info. However, I have read numerous reports from hams who have used SGC and other similar tuners to feed balanced lines. The only important condition was to use a choke balun to keep RF from coming back down the coax shield. Ed |
Question on dipole SWR problem
The feedline is doing more than transporting energy to the dipole centre, it almost certainly carries a significant common mode current and in that case is just as much a part of the radiating system as the dipole itself. So, isn't the coax and control line to the SG237 carrying current mode RF current, ie contibuting to radiation. Inch by inch, the detail unfolds. Yeah, inch by inch. I hate to fill up the post with too many details as some people grab something insignifcant and go off on a tangent.... however, the devil may be in the details..... You're right on the current in the shield. We have a choke balun, currently located 85' down the coax toward the transmitter. I have it scheduled, when it stops raining, to move it up to the input of the SG- 237 coupler unit. The Choke balun is homemade, 6" diamter, about 11 turns of RG-8X coax. Does that sound sufficient? I didn't make it or provide it. There is no control line for the SGC coupler unit. It only requires 12VDC @ 300ma and we are providing that by using a couple MFJ DC adapter units to feed the 12VDC up the coax. Ed |
Question on dipole SWR problem
Ed, sounds like your radios are into VSWR turndown from the inability of the tuner to match at the low end. It could be that the Z at 3825 is going high which a lot of tuners can't handle--or could be very low, same problem, no match. Try adding some more length to the dipole if you can and see if it tunes better at the low end. Even if you only drape pieces down at the ends would help if you can't extend more horizontally. 73,Bill W0BVR You, and others earlier on in this thread, have suggested such a thing. I have that on my list of things to try when the weather allows. Tnx. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com