| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Lux wrote in
: .... And, really, what precision do you need for pointing/plotting? Presumably folks are looking at fairly wide beamwidths (so that the sun size (1/2degree) is a small fraction of the beamwidth) 5 degrees? 1 degree? Jim, I suggested in my article that the Sun technique was most suited for beamwidths down to about 3 deg. As you have noted, there are a large number of other factors that become relevant at small beamwidths, and the most significant I think is the beamwidth correction factor to account for the Sun's departure from being close to a point source, then as you note the frequency dependent diameter of the radio Sun and the distribution of the Sun's intensity. So, down to 3 deg, the macros and formulae in my spreadsheet should be more than adequate. My thinking was that if you have a narrower antenna beamwidth, you probably have sufficiently high G/T to use one of the radio stars which will have much lower diameter. Owen |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Antenna Pattern Distortion due to 2 antenna placed in near vicinity | Antenna | |||
| distortion of the antenna pattern | Antenna | |||
| Antenna pattern from two antennas | Antenna | |||
| Antenna Pattern Shaping | Antenna | |||
| Antenna down tilt in pattern | Antenna | |||