Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Doe" wrote in message
... I am looking for the construction article "FRACTAL Antenna for 10m" that appeared sometime ago in I think either QST, Ham Radio, or 73 magazines. I have a lot of spare time on my hands - so I thought I would like to construct one and use it portable as I live in a Antenna Restricted Community. 73's As others have mentioned, several articles appeared in various magazines about the design of fractal antennas. The basic idea is to fold a standard length of wire using a fractal pattern so that it fits into a smaller space. One solution I saw was to wind a wire back and forth across and along a plank of wood using pins or slots cut in the wood to support the turns. Taking a four inch wide piece of wood around eight feet long and winding equispaced turns you could easily fit 24 feet of wire along the plank. __ __ __ |__| |__| |__| | Using a pattern like this. Other more complex or even three dimensional designs can fit more wire into a given space. Older interpretations of antenna theory predicted that the interaction between the closely spaced wires would effectively short out the turns and you would end up with the equivalent of an 8 foot length radiating element rather than the 24 feet of wire wound along the plank of wood. While there is interaction, the apparent reduction in radiator element length is not as bad as was predicted. So fractally wound elements can be worth the effort where space is at a premium. It is significant that the majority of development work into these antennas has taken place for frequencies above 1Ghz. Main applications include mobile phones, RF ID tags, security and remote sensing tags. At Ghz frequencies, exotic patterns can be easily etched onto circuit boards at minimal cost. Koch snowflake like fractal patterns combined with circular whorls seem very popular with commercial manufacturers. A google search will reveal quite a few pictures of what is being produced. It is not necessary to try and duplicate the complexity of professional designs. The main criteria seems to be to keep the wires as evenly spaced as possible, hence the width of the winding should be approximately equal to the linear step along the plank of wood or whatever support frame you are using, i.e. 4 inches up, 4 inches along, 4 inches down, four inches along, 4 inches up, etc. etc. As you will doubtless appreciate, this is similar to a three dimensional coil being wound on a former. Because the fractal winding is flat, there are fewer inductance effects. Obviously fractal antennae are designed for a specific frequency or band, but the type of winding pattern and spacing have an effect on the bandwidth. Obviously you will need two mirror image windings to create a dipole antenna, ideally as closely matched in dimensions as possible. Efficiencies can approach 50% of a full sized radiating element. Hope this helps Mike G0ULI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interesting antenna. Semi-fractal?? | Antenna | |||
Fractal Transmitter Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Penn State fractal antenna reduces unwanted lobes | Antenna | |||
FRACTAL ANTENNA | Antenna |