Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Nov, 17:02, Cecil Moore wrote:
K7ITM wrote: Perhaps the reason, Cecil, is because it's too simple. Perhaps it's BORING. Perhaps it's beating a dead horse. You're welcome to call it "interaction" if you wish; you're welcome to make it out to be more complex than it needs to be. But don't be expecting me to be using the word "interaction" for the case of simple vector addition in a linear system. I had this same conversation with Dr. Best years ago. He said that the canceled waves continued to travel in a straight line with zero associated energy. It sounds to me like you support that same notion. If not, please explain your position. Undetectable phantom waves containing zero energy are NOT simple. They are absolutely magical. How can waves exist without energy? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com What is it about these waves that is creating problems with antennas? Are the problems specific to the southwest desert area and what advancement are you looking for when the discussion is resolved. Frankly, until what constitute a" wave" which has three degrees of freedom is defined with respect to radio as well as its impact on communication, any foray into quantum mechanics would appear to be one of diminishing returns. Unless ofcourse you are intending to write a follow up on "Reflections" and start the discussion about "standing waves" where old discussions can be reprinted over and over again. Nothing personal since you often present new ideas that are enjoyable to read even tho you still get hammered but the "wave" thing went out with the tide a long time ago and memories have grown dim as to what it is all about Best regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|