Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny wrote:
On 160m, many think they can elevate a vertical 20 ft or so, and use maybe 4-8-10 radials to get good performance. It just doesn't work that way. Read Christman... Read Moxon... In general I agree with you but the devil is in the details... I had a 1/4WL 40m vertical with 8 elevated 1/4WL radials sloping from 20 ft to 5 feet above ground. At no time or distance did the vertical ever beat the one-wavelength dipole in the general directions of the dipole's maximum gain. I assumed it was because the radials were not high enough and not horizontal. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Soil dielectric constand and conductivity for East Texas | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
Ground rods in rocky soil | Antenna |