Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
80m Vertical over lossy soil
Following is a posting similar to what I made on QRZ.com in reply to a guy who
was asking what kind of antenna to use out west in the mountains surrounded by tall pines. It summarizes my recent experiences with a vertical on 80 m here in central New Jersey: Often you will hear the advice "Use a vertical. You will get the low angle of radiation which you need for DX." Be very careful. Although this statement may be true, you could still be disappointed, especially if you are surrounded by trees, and being in the mountains, might have poor soil, which is necessary for good vertical performance. I speak from experience. I have been building and improving my 80 meter vertical recently, with disappointing results. It is a full size quarter wave wire vertical, hung from a rope that goes from my 72 ft tower to a tree. I have 18 radials, 60 feet long. Now that is a pretty good vertical, with no loading coils, with not very much that can be done to improve it except maybe double the number of radials. I am located in central New Jersey on sandy soil. I have used this antenna for the past several weeks, mostly checking it out on DX. In no case has the vertical beaten out the inverted vee at 60 feet. In nearly every case the antennas are virtually identical. Even on DX to VK6 during CQWW this vertical should be kicking major butt, but it is not. Ok, so a few days ago I modelled both antennas with 4NEC2, and I made sure to include the appropriate parameters in the model for my soil conditions (poor). And I overlaid both antenna patterns on the same chart. Voila! There it is, the inverted vee beats the vertical at all angles above 10 degrees, and is equal below 10 degrees. The moral of the story, be careful about making assumptions regarding antenna performance without having an A-B switch! And maybe the other lesson to be learned is how meaningful the antenna modeling programs are. So my conclusion is that even though the vertical might have the low angle pattern, the losses in the soil do not allow the advantages to be realized. Phased arrays of similar antennas over lossy soil may show the nice pattern and f/b but the absolute value of gain expected may not be realized. 73 Rick K2XT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Soil dielectric constand and conductivity for East Texas | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
Ground rods in rocky soil | Antenna |