Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nick" wrote in message ... Hi, I want to install a vertical, fed with an SGC230 at the bottom, but concerned about minimising chance of a lightning strike on a bare conductor. Would it give more protection / solve the problem, if I encased it in a fibreglass yacht mast which I happen to have ? I plan it to be approx 40' high with the top 25' being a fibreglass yacht mast with the wire running up the inside. Top would be insulated / sealed so no ions could spray out, attracting a strike ... am I going the right way ? Thanks, Nick Nick With the voltages involved in a lightning strike, the fibreglass mast will not make much, if any, difference. Rain fall and dirt deposits will create a conductive path along the mast a few days or weeks after it has been erected. Lightning is attracted to the highest pointiest thing in an area, no matter what substance it is made from. Churches and trees are made of insulating materials and they attract more strikes than anything else on land. It was common to have to regularly rebuild the towers and steeples of medieval churches before lightning conductors were installed. The average steeple usually lasting no more than a century before suffering catastrophic damage from a lightning strike. At the time, this was just accepted as a sign that the parishioners were insufficiently pious, or had transgressed in some way. The fibreglass mast is ideal as a support and to provide weather protection for your antenna element(s), but do not count on it reducing the chances of a lightning strike it it is the tallest structure within 400 yards or so. Various tables and maps are available on the internet showing the frequency of lightning strikes per year per square mile or square kilometer for most areas in earth. These should help you evaluate the risks in your particular area. Forty feet is not particularly high and if you live in an area with less than 20 lightning days per year, I would evaluate the risk of a strike as being low. There is always a statistical risk and that's a chance you have to accept when dealing with any force of nature. Try to ensure that there is a good earth connection at the base of the vertical antenna using earth rods and/or buried radial wires so that in event of a strike, the lightning energy is dissipated into the ground rather than transmitted along the feedines into your house. A switch to disconnect and earth the antennas when equipment is not in use is always a good idea. A look through the MFJ catalogue will give you an idea of what equipment is available. Mike G0ULI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reducing effects of RF noise? | Shortwave | |||
Reducing RF noise interference? | Shortwave | |||
Reducing microphonics | Homebrew | |||
Reducing microphonics | Homebrew | |||
MFJ-9020 -- reducing WWV interference? | Equipment |