LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 18th 07, 05:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Superposition

Gene Fuller wrote:
Assuming one does not make an error in the setup of the
problem (perhaps a poor assumption) or in the math, the energy will
always come out correctly. It is not an independent consideration.


Energy has not been a consideration at all for many
people such as yourself. That's why you guys have
missed the boat as far as energy is concerned. You
have only given lip service to the conservation of
energy principle. When you are pressed for details,
you whole argument falls apart.

You got it wrong. Try again.


Please point out in detail what is wrong with it.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the Superposition Principle invalid? Cecil Moore[_2_] Antenna 58 April 4th 07 06:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017