Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
and ponder the implication of a negative power, for simplicity: P1 = 50W @ 90deg P2 = 50W @ 270deg what does the math reveal? Ptotal = P1 + P2 + 2*SQRT(P1*P2)cos(A) Ptotal = 50 + 50 + 2*SQRT(2500)cos(180) Ptotal = 50w + 50w - 100w = 0 There's 100 watts of destructive interference. The two waves are canceled in their original direction of flow. The energy in the two waves is redistributed to regions that permit 100 watts of constructive interference to occur. If the above happens in a transmission line, the "lost" energy in the canceled waves will simply be redistributed in the only other direction available. micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/interference/waveinteractions/index.html "... when two waves of equal amplitude and wavelength that are 180-degrees ... out of phase with each other meet, they are not actually annihilated, ... All of the photon energy present in these waves must somehow be recovered or redistributed in a new direction, according to the law of energy conservation ... Instead, upon meeting, the photons are redistributed to regions that permit constructive interference, so the effect should be considered as a redistribution of light waves and photon energy rather than the spontaneous construction or destruction of light." -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is the Superposition Principle invalid? | Antenna |